Message from @ZeroT
Discord ID: 552178391395074060
*Should the UN get involved in a woman’s right to have an abortion?*
That question makes no sense
They shouldn't but at a certain age the fetus is probably alive.
It's not because one makes a mistake that they only allowed to feel the full consequences instead of repairing the damage done.
But at some point, I think it's agreeable that it could be considered a baby. That's why if you're pregnant by accident, abort from the start. (Unless it's too late)
I am a pro life
It said for context that the UN declared abortion to be a human right, then the question asks about getting involved in a human right.
First of all, if you want to consider abortion to be a human right, how would affirming that be "getting involved"?
Getting involved is basically pro-life, by overturning that as a right of choice to a right to live for the fetus.
That is why the previous day question doesn't make complete sense to me
It's not easy to answer.
You can't ask the fetus if it wants to live.
Today's question might seem simple, but it is a bit more complicated, because it is related to internet algorithms.
But if you let it live as an accident, there are chances it will be treated as an accident.
Life isn't about consent
Instead of curing a disease, prevent it.
Mistakes do happen, but if you can prevent you should.
Well
Life is about consent, you can kill yourself at any time. Well most of the time.
I joined to debunk you
You can, doesn't make it moral
Because beliving vaccines are bad is really idiotic
It's idiotic but if they are right it's not.
They aren't
It's idiotic if the vaccines aren't fake, but it's smart if it's fake.
🤔
We're dealing with uncertainty here.
No
It's a thing of both sides.
WE DON'T
No man
This is not a thing about opinion
Those are scientific facts
Facts are a subjective opinion that is acknowledge by a massive group of people.
Not true
You can look up what a fact is.
Definetly not true
You are very wrong my friend
You are not good at debates.
Science doesn't work that way
<:mad:507991428924964867>
I disagree with many conspiracies, but you're attacking it wrongly.
"Science doesn't work that way."