They are not perfect, I can draw a parallel to this: If you use the same 'pest control' tactic against rats, they will eventually adapt to outsmart it. That's why when you reuse the same poison over and over, they may eventually develop an innate immunity. Also sometimes in rare cases, for x reasons vaccines can cause the actual disease. (X stands for any situation with different variables ex: non sterilized syringes, mistakes in genetic compound, etc whatever you could think of that would be possible even if unlikely.)
But, my opinion how that measle managed to infect the vaccined. Is that the measles probably was exposed to the vaccined people because of the host not being vaccined. (Think of it as you being on the other side of the canyon and eventually creating a bridge to the other side. The bridge being mutation in genetics to adapt.
However what I meant earlier is that while it's true vaccines are important if they are real. Is that it's kind of a dilemma I can't explain. I do think this vaccine conspiracy is unlikely and I really am not in the strong forte of believing it. But I have not dissected an actual vaccine myself (It'd require me to have some basis knowledge in that field mind you, and some plan to get my hands on it either) What I meant is that while if vaccines are real, they work. My point is that I wanna stay open to a paradigm shift that they are not.
I am not sure if you understand, my line of thinking is quite unorthodox. I agree with science but I also like to use creativity/logic simultaneously. I disagree with statistics even if they can be useful sometimes, but each situation is different. (May it be by only one atom particle to be different) While reusing the same tactic can work, it will not always work. (That's what I think over what you said about stats earlier)
