shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 193/856
| Next
wait wait are we being edgelords here?
๐ I'm always an edgelord ๐
๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐ฅ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐ ๐
edgy
I'm no edgelord, just a safetyscissorslord
Looks like multiracialism isn't working for the whites in South Africa. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1NyVYaI_V6w
more as I find them.
but that one in particular was like, 8 tweets, all responding to herself
after hooking into DJT's twitter feed
People use his Twitter as a platform to gain more followers not to actually add something useful to the conversation.
But yeah, the first, like, 100 tweets from Trump after the election
all had Bess Kalb as the first fucking post.
UNTIL
Apparently if you make a chain of tweets it ranks your posts higher so that's why people did it.
Which is kind of hypocritical when you consider the fact that
thats when the salt came in
she probably loved that he blocked her, for the publicity
Oh, absolutely.
But the thing is, he wasn't taking constructive shit from people
Well i predict this is going to backfire
People like this were just being abusive and degrading to him
Trump is not the kind of guy that takes constructive criticism
Bess Kalb is just one example.
or any kind of criticism
None of that was constructive.
Just imagine twitter handle of next dem president
Especially if its woman or another person of colour
Like, fuck
It will be funny to see sjw fuming how they cant do anything about it lol
that first message, he's wishing the Bushes well, and Bess Kalb has to fucking trash talk him THERE too
That's not constructive
Nah she was fishing for retweets
Oh, absolutely
Sargon made vid about her
We live in a weird age
but that's not constructive shit.
So, I mean
And described her very accurately
if we're going to make Trump's personal account public access, we've got to have a public way in for those otherwise banned
but as u said he had the account from before he was president
It just doesnt make any sense to me
It doesn't
But you have to have a contingency
I prefer to keep it simple, and think she is a stupid professional victim
Anyway declaring it public forum might mean that every politicians twatter will be deemed as such
She's not even named in the lawsuit.
If they are gonna declare twitter public forum, they should just be China and confiscate the company
And the fact that they will not be able to block ppl will make it very lucrative to employ professional shitposters
Hey, maybe now he'll use Twitter less. And his PR team will thank the Lord for answering their prays
So she piggybacks her whole career on stealing traffic from Trump
and then complains about it
lmao
look at the article
You will have team of ppl just folowing oposite partys accs and derailing and shitposting under neath without worry
And Twitter removing positive posts.
Hey, shitposting is a legitimate form of political discourse.
As long as they dont break rules any nonsense and reaction images will be legit ok
Much can be said in a shitpost
Yeah but it make sense for politician beeing able to currate his own social media acc
Making it impossible is making it harder to actually communicate with electorate if the politician chooses so
Also
the author of that peice
IS a listed principal Plaintiff in the case.
Very professional lol
I hope he at least mentioned it
In that article
@Timcast should look at some of the stuff I've got here and confirm it, if he's going to cover that in tomorrow's video. (If he hasn't got that already! :P)
It's an interesting look at the matter, anyway.
Sure deserves a videa in any case
Its game changer
So if the lawsuit wins then noone can block anyone on twitter?
And apparently, even among people who are just going to delight in the chaos that comes with it, there's still disagreement on which side is actually "right".
which makes it all the more amusing.
No just official political acc shouldent be able to
According to the judge
oh ok
but then there would be a precedent that twitter is a public forum
I think they might come with some sort of guideline for it
and hell will break loose
The way it's framed, it's supposed to only target Trump
Maybe you will be able to set rules of conduct
why I keep calling it an activist judgement
It will require to either be expanded, or revoked.
Either one is going to lead to leftist butthurt
Yeah as i said it will very likely backfire big time
It's a case of the left crafting a weapon, and not considering it's use against them
This is the product of old laws that dont work on the internet
RE: Hate Crime laws and Title IX
IRL u cant block somebody from talking to u
Funny thing is that i agree in principle
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 193/856
| Next