Yeah but it make sense for politician beeing able to currate his own social media acc

Making it impossible is making it harder to actually communicate with electorate if the politician chooses so

https://www.politico.com/f/?id=00000163-8e16-dd91-abe7-8f3f5f050001

Also

the author of that peice

IS a listed principal Plaintiff in the case.

Very professional lol

I hope he at least mentioned it

In that article

@Timcast should look at some of the stuff I've got here and confirm it, if he's going to cover that in tomorrow's video. (If he hasn't got that already! :P)

It's an interesting look at the matter, anyway.

Sure deserves a videa in any case

Its game changer

So if the lawsuit wins then noone can block anyone on twitter?

And apparently, even among people who are just going to delight in the chaos that comes with it, there's still disagreement on which side is actually "right".

which makes it all the more amusing.

No just official political acc shouldent be able to

According to the judge

oh ok

but then there would be a precedent that twitter is a public forum

I think they might come with some sort of guideline for it

and hell will break loose

The way it's framed, it's supposed to only target Trump

Maybe you will be able to set rules of conduct

why I keep calling it an activist judgement

It will require to either be expanded, or revoked.

Either one is going to lead to leftist butthurt

Yeah as i said it will very likely backfire big time

It's a case of the left crafting a weapon, and not considering it's use against them

This is the product of old laws that dont work on the internet

RE: Hate Crime laws and Title IX

IRL u cant block somebody from talking to u

Funny thing is that i agree in principle

There are ways of doing so.

You should have a public forum

I mean if u are in a park and somebody answers to everything u say, u can ignore them but not make them shut up

Sure.

But not beeing able to currate your own twitter feed is different

But by giving people the option to block

Twitter gives people agency, establishing that it's NOT an open public space.

That, like in real life, if someone's just taking a shit in your living room, you have the right to kick them out.