Message from @zutt
Discord ID: 449101852601221121
and then complains about it
lmao
look at the article
You will have team of ppl just folowing oposite partys accs and derailing and shitposting under neath without worry
And Twitter removing positive posts.
Hey, shitposting is a legitimate form of political discourse.
As long as they dont break rules any nonsense and reaction images will be legit ok
Much can be said in a shitpost
Yeah but it make sense for politician beeing able to currate his own social media acc
Making it impossible is making it harder to actually communicate with electorate if the politician chooses so
Also
the author of that peice
IS a listed principal Plaintiff in the case.
Very professional lol
I hope he at least mentioned it
In that article
@Timcast should look at some of the stuff I've got here and confirm it, if he's going to cover that in tomorrow's video. (If he hasn't got that already! :P)
It's an interesting look at the matter, anyway.
Sure deserves a videa in any case
So if the lawsuit wins then noone can block anyone on twitter?
And apparently, even among people who are just going to delight in the chaos that comes with it, there's still disagreement on which side is actually "right".
which makes it all the more amusing.
No just official political acc shouldent be able to
According to the judge
oh ok
but then there would be a precedent that twitter is a public forum
I think they might come with some sort of guideline for it
and hell will break loose
The way it's framed, it's supposed to only target Trump
Maybe you will be able to set rules of conduct
why I keep calling it an activist judgement
It will require to either be expanded, or revoked.
Either one is going to lead to leftist butthurt
Yeah as i said it will very likely backfire big time
It's a case of the left crafting a weapon, and not considering it's use against them
This is the product of old laws that dont work on the internet
RE: Hate Crime laws and Title IX
IRL u cant block somebody from talking to u
Funny thing is that i agree in principle