shitposting
Discord ID: 398973785426100234
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 151/856
| Next
So... a scottish comedian got fined 800ยฃ for saying that nazis are not cute... or did i miss something here?
>My Bolshevik enemy can't be this cute!
"The state [Michigan] announced it's done giving out free bottled water to the city of Flint. A few years ago, officials there switched the city's water source to save money. But the water wasn't treated properly, exposing people to dangerous levels of lead and damaging the pipelines. The mayor declared a state of emergency and the governor brought in the National Guard." -9 April 2018
lol
Legend
NOW THAT'S FUCKING BASTE
I guess we can say that 9 Canadians won today?
@AussieAryan#2292 whats really interesting about that if its true is how very similar females can perform intelectually compared to males of the species.
that sounds weird indeed
>ban jokes
@Arch-Fiend There are more male geniuses and male retards while females tend to be more average.
this is something i knew
thats why i noted how interesting it was
same
it still seems weird to me
is that the only source (from Florida) or is there more data on it?
also, women's IQ is closer to the average than men's
afaik this isn't race dependent
my comparison was between gender
sure for other races the averages are different
but doesn't the same still remain true?
Yes it dose.
(women IQ lower than men but more women closer to the average)
then race isn't a factor =p
I feel you posted the race one just because.
Yes you are right about the average male and female IQ differences but the races also have difference average IQ's.
I posted the race differences to point out that those IQ scores I posted earlier was taken from a white population.
sure, but if the same conclusion is true no matter the race, it isn't a factor
a lefty would look at that and say you are race baiting
and avoid the valid conclusion we had before that
=p
Hey Aussie, why is it that US blacks are so much higher than 'Africans' on that thing you linked? 15 points is a major difference..
Another 15 points and they'd be right on par with White people.
Africa isn't a good place to pick for IQ ๐
I'm not even sure if it's just related to race there tbh
life conditions in Africa make it easier to survive without effort (compared to the rest of the world). There's no family values and a lot of sex going on
there's a _lot_ of reasons why all of that would produce low IQ people even if race wasn't a factor
in countries that are opressive the smart people leave and go elsewhere which reduces the average of that country, boiling all those factors into 1 number is a weak argument
I mean, I was making a point.
That graph counteracts an alt-right narrative.
It's easy to come with factors for a 15 point drop. Not that easy for a 15 point spike
Also, 15 points on the average is _a lot_
I agree, exactly my point, Belial.
US blacks descended from slaves would've been brought over from Africa. The slaves that were sold to white people were prisoners of war. In theory, they would've been the inferiors to their jailors. So, did African IQ DROP between then and now, or did the US blacks increase in IQ? Either one works against the idea that sending black people that currently reside in the United States to Africa is in their best interest, an oft-argued point on the alt-right side of things.
@RyeNorth Blacks in America on average have 20% white admixture which means they have some genes that whites have which on average makes them smarter than Blacks. http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/race-and-iq-related-genes/
That still doesn't rebuke the crux of the argument, but on the other hand, I think that's a point made disingenuously, anyway.
I see you point that blacks have lived better in America than they have in Africa and that would have improved their IQ's through that envirionment to a extent how ever you need to rember that envirionmental factors have had at most 50% influence with regrads to IQ and keep in mind that is a liberal estimate.
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/iq-and-socio-economic-status/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/race-iq-and-poverty/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/race-and-stress/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/04/15/stereotype-threat/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2017/01/07/race-intelligence-and-nutrition/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/12/23/race-iq-and-lead/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2017/01/07/transracial-adoption-and-the-black-white-iq-gap/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/09/10/the-flynn-effect-race-and-iq/
http://thealternativehypothesis.org/index.php/2016/09/25/child-abuse-and-racial-differences-in-crime-and-iq/
You're talking about a measured statistic that barely even existed 100 years ago.
We don't have a real measure of the IQ of European society as it developed. We don't even have a measure of IQ in colonial times, or anything of the like.
Your sample group is limited, and your source is biased.
This explains why Europeans are the way they are. What is your argument against it? https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P78Zd8265_k
My argument against it is that I refuse to accept Alt-Hypothesis as a source. Find me a neutral one.
Wordpress...
It's a PDF copy of a book
85,553 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 151/856
| Next