newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 187/350
| Next
If the people donโt like what the states doing they can make changes
if you can't give a standing ovation for at least 11 minutes you should not be in favour of communism
But when you give all authority over to the state you loose you ability to make changes as the people
โgovernment of the people, by the people, for the peopleโ
I love how Kyle thinks all dem voters are like him
Pfffft
He should go talk to some strangers that arnt millenials
Hell talk to millennial that are simply just not unemployed or with a stereotypical job
Like sorry but Starbucks baristas donโt represent the overall voter
Also they praise Cortez when I bet the Republicans had a higher turnout in New York overall if they had a primary
Repubs vote in primaries, Dems barely do
Iโve essentially watched it
Only like 200 Dems showed up at the precinct I was at and like 500 Repubs
Sweden cant take it anymore
"We're Not Gonna Take It"
whats with Europeans and creating parties called Alternative for (insert country here) its sooooo lazy
it's because we have 20 parties that already take any meaningful name for a party but are all basically the same
ah
the party party
founded on bill and ted's laws
Be Excellent To Each Other.... Party On, Dudes!
id join that one lel
Dude Weed Lmao
bound to win elections
"Cop Pulls Gun on Children, Threatens Them With Baton"
regarding the RT vid its interesting to see Communists try to stop the violence
in germany we have literally a party called "The PARTY" (in german obviously)
lol
one of them is actually in the European parliament ๐
lol RT covered Angry Foreigner
in that vid
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=retQHh7dIpM important news right here
that party "the party" is closely aligned with trump, they also want to build a wall. except they want to build a wall around eastern germany... then again, they blame blame everything on the russians, so... democrat? (they were founded by the editors a satire magazine)
Do you guys actually watch RT
I heard some stuff but never really looked into it
I used to but largely dont trust them
im on and off
Is it really Russian propaganda
theyre owned by the Russian Government so Pro-Russian Bias
Not always
A couple of their "partners" are fine but im really skeptical
Alright
So like with everything look at their narrative
I think it's fair that Trudeau is held accountable because it's his ideology that does the purity test.
i don't think he really has an ideology. he strikes me as the "i say what i thinks sounds good to the media" kind of guy
I'm pretty sure he is pushing it, out of stupidity or not
Peoplekind
Kek
One should takes ones own medicine
peoplekind did sound like a "whatever, stop talking" to me, but hey thats just me
I think he was hoping for a way out of the question with 'peoplekind'
like i said "whatever, stop talking" ๐
@Deleted User so is this dan ryan thing the blm thing you were talking about your boyfriend telling you about a week or so ago?
โDonald Trump is guilt....... The only remaining question is what exactly heโs guilty ofโ by max boot on Foreign Policy
The left knows Trump is guilt. Itโs a matter of faith. They feel itโs true.
http://archive.today/BG6QK
yeah. i feel that i won a billion dollars in the lottery last week.
Sweet @I AM ERROR I feel like youโre going to share that with me.
all these feelings ๐
I dated a girl who enharited a mil when she turned 18
why past tense? ๐
Because the money wasn't worth the crazy
ah... you are talking about glados ๐
Hahahaha
Exactly
No she blew through it though she's got 2 kids cuck of a bf and a shitty life
dont know if this has been posted already but
good guys kicking them out
MSM will probs ignore it though
cause it doesnt support the narrative
good
One senior diplomat said that the Chequers meeting had resulted in a โmelange of earlier proposals that were not really feasibleโ. Stressing that his government needed to see the white paper before taking a position, he said: โA goulash gets better the more it is recooked. I am not sure about whether the customs proposals share the same quality.โ
Lel
Goulash brexit
I like this one
In a liberal society, then liberals must be conservatives to maintain that libertarian society.
thats pretty much how it is
hello
hi
Whats in the news today? did you watch any dan ryan action?
not me
seemed like boring event
I caught the end of Metokurโs stream and it seemed mega lame
Closed down the highway and walked a few exits then disbanded
yeah i came across a group of moorish americans live streaming about it. one of them went to the protest but left before they all went out to the highway. i don't get what inconviencing others does to show solidarity for being anti violence.
if anything that would make others who don't understand why they are protesting to be frustrated...
Hey i'm gonna self-promo a bit here
I produce a radio show at school, and pre-record my own "weird news" segment https://youtu.be/FSc5JKSB3SA?t=1373 here's a timestamp to it
@King Canuck love it man
Thanks d00d
It's a fun segment to make
๐ ๐ Fusion review
ooops
I don't often give in to schadenfreud, but damn if I don't get a smile every time I see another sword stuck in the crawling corpse of Gawker.
No one enjoys watching at other peopel suffer, but if you HAVE TO, well you might aswell enjoy it
I enjoy it sometimes.
Depends what it is.
I enjoy Schadenfreude when it could've been avoided
if its a "hold my beer" moment
I will 'hold' your beer
If you hold my beer, i expect the content to remain the same when i return! ๐
Lmao.. Sargon already suspended
Again? Onm YT or Twitter?
No deal. Beer holding tax at 100%
well, enjoy the mis-intended roofie then
Saves roofieing myself at 3am when I'm literally the last person left
fine! you wont get to hold my beer then!
see if i care! ๐ฌ ๐ซ
I hold your beer every time you're not looking anyway
so thats why the mug handle is warm every time i return from a piss
I warm the beer handle for you, you warm the toilet seat for me. Win/win
But who would warm my heart?
@Lucian me after I get roofied
So probably never
Correct
Did Tim Pool cover the GW2 writers getting fired?
For Twitter SJW antics?
Dont think so ey
That's too small of a thing in the grand scale I guess
2 writers were jerks and got fired and played victims afterwards..not really news
I disagree I think it's a pretty relevant culture war story. ๐
ยฏ\_(ใ)_/ยฏ
I just heard so many people on the social justice side to be awful human beings and get into trouble for it and then claiming victim (usually if person of some status, defended by media) that I'm numb to it
The breakdown of how journalists are reporting it is pretty interesting imo haha
Buzzfeed "Players are boycotting GW2 after it fires female dev" lol
Ah yes, that sounds honest. ๐
BUT OFCOURSE
Woman can never be in fault
It's those damn misgoynist white male gamers or wut
Pretty much. It was totally unrelated to her gender in any way
and she publicly accuses him of sexism
dude couldn't have been MORE polite about disagreeing
Yea..
Echoes of #gamergate ๐
Oh how the tides have shifted, though. Now they're the one's getting fired, haha.
Ironic, the hunters have become the hunted
Not really.. it's still the same not much changed in terms of narrative
The few people who get fired only get fired because they are too awful that their politics can't save them anymore, anything else gets brushed under the rug
wow:
whoops
who needs spies when you can have apps
does make a point for free market,
a random corporation clearly does better at spying civilians, and tracking their location than the NSA or FBI
๐
When the government does it, it is tyranny
well the difference is that government would demand the right to information, making it tyranny
The corporation has you give it willingly
That's the scary part
"nazis" attack "innocent" antifa
What is the story with VFN? Are they an "Onion" site? Is it "staged" news? What are they?
to be clear, you're talking about the youtube channel "very fake news," yes?
That is correct. The name screams "Don't Believe me!" But the content seems pretty good.
the content is composed of ripped clips from other news sources
So it is a Viewer Beware site. Make your own Context?
i believe so, yes
Cool. Thanks for the info
no problem
"Prominent Doctor Lifts Veil of Secrecy on Vaccine & Pharmaceutical Industries (Special Release)" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8-YUuQyQ-M
'it was a bad movie, but not because of social justice' ..yes and no, the SJ content may hold to that, but the production of the movie under SJ guidelines is what made it a poor story.
But personally I do think the SJ content also made it poor. I'm more than happy to see the whamen onscreen and in power positions, but when intergalactic warriors act like pussies because they are pussies then they would have already been culled
Ripley wasn't a feminist and she nailed a planet full of aliens, if she was an SJW she would have made Nute into a trans pan kid and the aliens would have used that time to eat them
Holy shit xD the madman actually tweeted this
I wonder if these same people are saying that he wont be reelected
and we'll have that video
i can't stop laughing, this is the best tweet i've ever seen simply cuz he posted this
white guilt?
jeeeezus
we know that there are NO KNOWN health benefits associated with mercury intake that are "good for you in moderation" .... so ANY amount of mercury intake is only ever associated with health RISKS rather than benefits
ANY amount is a bit too far, but it should be above the recommended threshold that your system could accept
and what would be a health benefit of intaking ANY bit mercury per se?
pure mercury... an eency weency tiny bit amount like in a "supplement". even less than moderate amt. what is ONE health benefit to that?
True that there isnt't any health benefits, but I'm just pointing out that in cases like these dosage is pretty important
so its not too far to say that there are no known health benefits to ANY intake of mercury.... only known health risks. thats all i was saying because we know this is true. unless anyone can find a tried and true benefit of intaking any mercury at all, thats all itd take to falsify this claim
not to mention this was all i needed to falsify the claim that "everything is good in moderation" ..... wonder how many other zero-health benefit ingredients are added to vaccine cocktails.... probably dozens at least
A vaccine is supposed to simulate an attack on the immune system to get it to know how to deal with a real one.
I am sure that the mercury in vaccines are not in its pure form, rather part of an existing compound
right, right thats the whole idea. but theory and observation dont always agree w/ each other
and then you have tons of auto-immune diseases cases erupting where the immune system thinks the very organs/tissue of the PERSON is a "threat"
As for all the chemicals added to vaccines. Not too sure, could just bbe really modern failsafes. The original vaccines were just pus from the sores of infected people.
all im saying is.... this is an pro-informed-consent.... message
Not saying tis wrong, being misinformed is wrong. But not my fault, you got me thinking why some of those chemicals are there.
Now Im really curious what they used for.
ya, did you see the article i posted earlier about the CDC published ingredients?
Reminds me of that ciggarettes have over 1000+ chemicals
And they list down all the uses of it.
I dont smoke, but I reckon that if you search hard enough, you can find something innoculous that is used to produce one of the most unhealthiest things out there.
Some are added to stabilise the the vaccine solution, some is to prevent coagulation of the ingredients inside
Makes sense, pus hardens.
Harder for it to spread in the blood stream
But I think they should list the ingredients and uses in that vaccine so that we can be more inform about it
Yeah, its a mix of issues here.
One, slightly informed people can be more harmful than uninformed people
Informed enough to know that mercury is in it, but not enough to know that its in there as part of a compound and is harmless in that state,
True
cant imagine anyone in their right mind to read that LONG list of ingredients and be like.... "YEP, THAT SOUNDS GOOD!"
But we pretty much turn a blind eye to almost every other things like shampoo, soap, etc
Or even the processed food we eat
I mean it makes sense, but that falls back to my statement
Half informed is worse than uninformed.
thats not as bad as injecting them directly in you... which bypasses most of the body's protective barriors that help to filter and mitigate extreme complications and reactions
And its hella hard to make sure someone is "fully informed"
And people should try harder, keeping stuff like that hidden will only arouse suspicioun
doesnt matter anyways... no means no .... the obligation is not on us to prove that we are "fully informed"
Even then, people should look at the results anyway.
Having the information available is more important, because you can't really change the lazy people
If they cant understand the chems in vaccines, they should understand the results of the vaccines.
of course, they should be encouraged to read the insert label and see all the side effects admitted to and disclaimed straight out of the horses mouth
I am sure that its a thing where the drugs advertised in the US will say helps with x and then list down dozens of potential side effects,
my position is basic.... i am pro-consumer-choice
not "anti-vaxx"
Though I think showing the ingredients alone isnt enough
Anti vac is quite ridiculous tho
I was thinking, look what we achieved, well, this is what we needed.
i am for CLEAN and thoroughly third party safety tested vaccines and stuff after all w/o all the added toxic garbage perservatives and other adjuvents
yeah, you still would not be fully informed just by scanning over the list of ingrediets without a thoroough understanding about each and every one of them.... its just not worth the risk
net overall risk over benefit for much too high of risk
thats just my opinion..... you are free to make the final decision and choices for your own healthcare procedures
Well id say trust the science, but blind faith is harmful
We seen the far left and their "science"
i do trust the science.... thats the whole idea of my side too ๐ the science of the safety studies which only lead to further concerns
Which is a hard question to be very honest.
Mainly, I stand that everything should be transparent.
But that means everyone must be informed and not lazy
In essence we all believe something because someone told us so.
We read history books. Thats us being told by a historian who looked into the matter personally.
but there will always be uninformed and lazy people on the *administrative side* of these issues too..... ppl in govt bureaucracy act in self-interested ways too.... thats the problem. they can be just as uninfomed and irrational too.. that is why forced vaccination is too dangerous (and morally wrong)
And of course, there is harm in being withheld info from "for your own protection"
Also thats why Vac is a hard question
Im all of the people have a right.
But we can also see the results of not enough people being vaccinated.
For me the solution is to ensure all people are properly informed of the results. But that wont work if there is no trust.
im all for innovations and improving vaccination science and practice to be less risky/hazardous than it is currently
What are the risks of vaccinations as of now?
We do get some allergic reactions I guess.
sorry i dont want to get into that.... there are dozens of potential complications from neurological disorders to auto-immune diseases, mental retardation (of infants in pregnant mothers)... and of course to death
potential?
Or are they saying, it could, but has it?
there just needs to be more long-term, impartial, third party, peer reviews, non-manufacturor funded studies
the jury is still out. so the science is not settled in the meantime
87,357 total messages. Viewing 250 per page.
Prev |
Page 187/350
| Next