There's a reason you're instructed to not do anything such as make quick movements for your pockets in front of police officers.

When you're pulled over, don't move around a lot and just keep your hands on the steering wheel, etc.

And yeah, when you actually see the video that was taken, you'll see that he was clearly freaked out. He was clearly not ready to be out on active duty yet.

He was not. He said for the guy to get his wallet then freaked out when he did as asked.

I don't know how to respond to that other than to say that no, he was?

He clearly was if you saw that video.

Unless you're trying to say he was putting on some kind of act?

When in doubt, say specifically what you're going to do, then do so, slowly. If that isn't good enough, get out of the car.

Ask before you do anything.

I agree it shouldn't be this way, but this is more a matter of police training than it is anything else.

Indeed, the fact that officers in the US only get half a year's worth of training before they hit the streets is absolutely incomprehensible to me.

Becoming an officer over here is literally getting a Bachelor's degree, and takes at least three years.

same here... and one of the hardest jobs to get.

@JadenFrostwolf I was agreeing that the cop was not ready for active duty. He asked for the guy to give him info, so he was getting his info. The cop freaked out that the dude was slowly reaching for his info and started to scream don't reach for "it", and it was clear to both parties that "it" meant the gun and the driver said "I'm not". This cop was clearly not in a good state of mind to be out on patrol.

Yeah, I read that convo, it was more just a general statement than specifically addressed to you, sorry. lol

It was a generalized 'you', not a *you* 'you.'

*Checks to make sure that makes sense.*

..yeah..

Well this is interesting. http://www.foxnews.com/us/2018/04/07/ala-teen-turns-down-25-year-plea-deal-gets-sentenced-to-65-years-instead-and-laughs.html

TL;DR:4 people break into house, cops show up, one robber starts shooting at the cops, cops fire back, killing him. Now one of the other remaining 3 is being sentenced to 65 years for the robbery and a count of murder... Of the robber killed by the police.

Was he the leader of the group?

I learned in class that they'll sometimes pin any other crimes committed by the others on the ringleader, but I don't remember that applying to the police.

An accomplice law that basically said anyone who participated in a crime could be held accountable for murder should a death occure.

Why just one of the teens, though, and not all of them?

Oh, 'cause he didn't take the plea bargain. I guess the other two did.

Idk, my assumption is that this guy just got the largest sentence so I would guess that the other 2 might have.

Would have to look into the records for the other two.

Says the others have not been sentenced yet so that's why

"Those who tweet in Spain risk imprisonment"
https://translate.google.be/translate?sl=nl&tl=en&js=y&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&u=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.mo.be%2Fanalyse%2Fspanje-wie-tweet-riskeert-gevangenisstraf&edit-text=&act=url

so you guys ready for world war 3?

didint really think it would start on my birthday

whats happened now?

we just killed some russians

https://twitter.com/spectatorindex/status/983159920395665408?s=19

we killed some russians in syria not too long ago

they were firing at our troops so they got a face load of bombs.

https://twitter.com/Joyce_Karam/status/983153786893029377?s=19

https://twitter.com/Partisangirl/status/983158044300226560?s=19

i like this guy https://twitter.com/BaruchSandhaus/status/983160423414484994

@Arch-Fiend we killed 7 russians last time

and a whole load of syrians

one small step for man, one giant leap for the 4 horsemen

at some point they will think its a good idea to retaliate

it won't lead to anything, syria is just another proxy war.

you cant just keep punching the kid with the most nukes in the school in the head every day during lunch break and not expect to ever face reprocussions

you think that kid doesn't punch you in the head with equal frequency?

how often do russian missles from russian boats land in our alleys military bases while our people are cought up the the crossfire?

russia and american are the two sides of the same coin and have been for a while.

actually weve been at war with ourselves for the most part in the middle east since the 2000's

supplying weapons to the same people we kill

this situation is a bit different

i mean, when is american not making its own problems?

this is more like the gulf war but we dont actually know how its going to go because its been like 40 years

american's number one export: causing our own problems and fucking over the locals as we do

world is a bit of a different place now, hell if i know whats going to happen

i dont think we will see a repeate of the same

we might not have a world war but i dont think we are seeing the dominos fall in the same pattern

i wouldn't be surprised if the "syrians" attacked american bases in retaliation, only they are flying russian planes, speak russian, and fly back to a russian base.

i expect that to happen

that was kinda what i ment

its no different than the last what, 50-70 years?

then it has the oppertunity to escolate, maybe it doesent though

Vietnam, Cuban missile crisis, the Gulf war, the whole conflict in syria, same shit, different day

syria is a different situation than the rest of the middle east was to us

and if you go back to the time of the soviet union the entire world was very different

you know the cuban missile crisis was started by us and we committed a literal act of war by blockading cuba? World didn't go into WW3, why would attacking a valid military target that russians should have been in in the first place be worse than that?

during the gulf war russia was a failing empire, now they are a relitively stable yet precariously placed country with more viable threats than they had in the past

shouldn't*

if the russians don't want to be bombed, they should be hanging out with people attacking american soldiers. the same applies to us.

and the ability for both our sides to wag a finger at the other for "attacking us" when we are hanging around their official enemy is why we chill out there

the number of bullets hasent changed much but the number of guns has increased, the eu is in a position to make choices that have a far more meaningful impact (be it good or bad) than they did during the gulf war, the chinese can get involved, while during the gulf they had issues they were sorting out, japan is militerizing (though i think thats a good thing), north korea is on the map and is a mouse carrying dynomite

if north korea makes the first move in any conflict, even china says they are on their own, so i wouldn't count NK in there.

i think its more a consern that they end up taking the second move

NK don't want war. The only reason they want nukes is so that no one invades them.

if the usa is involved in a conflict already of greater magnitude than its been in in 30 years than china wont be as intimidated and will give nk a longer leash, nk will see that and the fact the usa is more distracted as an oppertunity to be a retard

NK needs china, and why would china nuke the us? It would cause them take a major hit to their economy

i've become jaded to WW3 since literally every little thing is "this will be WW3!" and has been that way for basically all of my life.

you know how long "NK is gonna start firing off nukes!" has been around?

the last 10-20 years at least.

hell, why haven't we attacked them yet? aren't we like a year overdue for that now?

china can justify a self defense war much better than it can a world war, but can use a self defense to restructure its economy into a milierized one and low key shift out of consumer communism and into something more like NK but with actual weight behind it

and then need to start a war or kill its own economy?

china basicly uses slave labor already, thats actualy kind of a good place to start if you want a cheap and productive war machine

i think the thing is no one wants to be first, because the first shooter is the loser right now

thats why im complaining about america and its bullshit

admitedly america can get away with shooting first and maybe winning

they didn't shoot first, russia already shot first in syria

but it gives everyone else an excuse to do what theyve wanted to do for 50 years

syria is their alley

and they have been accused of using chemical weapons in syria

you can only spin russia as a bad guy there if your cnn

and are still in hot water over the whole diplomat poisoning

theres substantial evidence they didint actually do that poisoning

Nor use chemical weapons.

consitering they were accused of that before the actual poison was identified and it turned out to not actually be the poison that the uk accused them of using

there is no "shooting first" in syria anymore. because both sides have backed 1 or more sides.

and conveniently that story never made it to MSM

like the girl who was poisoned is awake right now

has been for a month

i've basically written off any conflict in the middle east area as just more of the same bullshit