Message from @Arch-Fiend
Discord ID: 432734857865592862
you know how long "NK is gonna start firing off nukes!" has been around?
the last 10-20 years at least.
hell, why haven't we attacked them yet? aren't we like a year overdue for that now?
china can justify a self defense war much better than it can a world war, but can use a self defense to restructure its economy into a milierized one and low key shift out of consumer communism and into something more like NK but with actual weight behind it
and then need to start a war or kill its own economy?
china basicly uses slave labor already, thats actualy kind of a good place to start if you want a cheap and productive war machine
i think the thing is no one wants to be first, because the first shooter is the loser right now
thats why im complaining about america and its bullshit
admitedly america can get away with shooting first and maybe winning
they didn't shoot first, russia already shot first in syria
but it gives everyone else an excuse to do what theyve wanted to do for 50 years
syria is their alley
and they have been accused of using chemical weapons in syria
you can only spin russia as a bad guy there if your cnn
and are still in hot water over the whole diplomat poisoning
theres substantial evidence they didint actually do that poisoning
Nor use chemical weapons.
consitering they were accused of that before the actual poison was identified and it turned out to not actually be the poison that the uk accused them of using
there is no "shooting first" in syria anymore. because both sides have backed 1 or more sides.
and conveniently that story never made it to MSM
has been for a month
i've basically written off any conflict in the middle east area as just more of the same bullshit
russia wasent really involved until recently
you must remimber, staying out of russias shit was why we voted against hillery
it just kind of seems like that didint go anywhere
yes, so now history is going to repeat itself over there?
no, like i just said the world is a different place now
humans don't change
same game, different skin
War has changed.
more players
<:Kappa:327142715592540171>
were in a much higher stress situation than we were with the gulf
its more like korea but not even exactly like that
theres really not actually anything comparible to this i can think of
are you sure about that? are you sure we are in a much higher stress situation than any other time since WW2?
not as bad as the cuban missle crisis
the kind of stress is different, we dont really know what will even happen during a world war with nukes
will they even be used with so much going on at once? we kind of assume they are mutually assured distruction weapons but not nessicaraly in this context would they be
nukes are a bad tactical option for any country to use. I can guarantee the only reason a nuke will be used is in retaliation of another nuke.