newsroom
Discord ID: 398858182455459853
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 46/874
| Next
That last one
if anything the last thing id do when I see an "offensive" shirt referring to primates, is to chimp out and prove them right
I am just here to make sure people are infromed.
When dispensing red pills, you dont want an overdose. Causes a hostile reaction
isnt monkey a bit dated though like calling an Italian a guinea
Yeah
pound the pavement
How long you reckon before tim regrets making a channel
Pretty much all the content creators I seen regret making them
๐ค who?
lol...
Tim's new video is up.
Oh, boy... The Gender wage gap. I feel like there needs to be a real study about the wage gap just so we can end this myth already
From what I've read, there have already been real studies disproving it, but the people pushing the gender wage gap completely ignore them
That's typical. I know the wage gap was created from the CDC study of the average pay of genders but even in that study itself it says it's not about discrimination, only about the life choices both genders make.
Yeah, the wage gap has been debunked over and over, they're just ignoring it.
Maybe they can't maths.
or actually read the study themselves...
No, they've read the studies. They just discount the findings by saying that the authors are sexist/racist/etc. and their study was biased from the start.
The wage gap? More like CIA GLOBALIST DEEP STATE PSYOP
Maybe we need a separate channel for so-called "conspiracy" theories?
kek I would be down for that haha
nvm we have the shitposting tab
Eh, I feel like this deserves its own channel instead of just being lumped in with general shitposting
Otherwise, possibly relevant information could be lost in the general flood
https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/am-i-a-bad-feminist/article37591823/
hmmm... I have a feeling 2018's major feminist topic is removing the due processes in the legal system. They've done it in universities so I'd only imagine their aiming for a larger target now.
inb4 you're a misogynist for wanting a fair trial in court.
college judgement was always really not-formally-legal
mock justice
Tim please
you know the 31 genders thing is literally just virtue signalling
they don't take it seriously when playing the wage gap card
The way I see it all the people with new โgendersโ are either mentally ill, making them up to play the victim card, or both. Since victimhood is so profitable now it doesnโt surprise me that people would try gaming the system to acquire victim status.
Learned helplessness I think its called
I think thatโs more of a depression thing.
it's literally rp
taking it serious is a mental illness
๐ฎ
playing devil's advocate, wouldn't it be applied because for sure at least 49% of the population has an 'issue' with lower wages
vs the folks who are probably represented in < 1% of the population
IRL I don't know why it isn't being treated as a mental illness
I guess maybe sometimes the psychological ball rolls into corners where things get normalized
progressives won't make that argument because they would seem disrespectful of the struggles of being trans
Yeah I'm not a fuckin' progressive
but I would justify it that way were I in their shoes
that or equality of outcome for all genders
being trans isnt a mental illness, taking gender seriously over actually becoming successful is
we only really see the (usually extreme) trans activists in the media
Gender dysphoria isn't a mental illness?
Thinking youโre in the wrong body and wanting to lop off your genitals seems pretty mental illness-y to me.
^
not all trans people experience gender dysphoria
and even then, actually taking it seriously is the problem
like otherkins
If you mean that some people only claim to be trans because it's gives you social 'credit' with the left, then I would agree, probably.
obviously people are going to gain the system and do everything they can do gain social power
Yeah.
but it's fairly easy to tell if they are being dishonest or willfully ignorant, which IMO most of the trans progressive activists are
Such as when they deny that *biological* sex is even a thing, like that one college professor (I think he was?) up in Canada, when he was debating Jordan Peterson.
particularly not citing anything credible when it comes to the association between gender expression and biological gender
the most credible papers i've seen cited (if at all, most of the time it's just a shitty blog post) have little to 0 citations and/or aren't even in the psychology and sociology field
social constructivists are ignorant of the most basic psychological observation that a lot of our behaviors are not formed socially, you can see this in animals that can walk right after being born, insects in general, the gag reflex, sneezing, shaking in the cold, all of our facial expressions being consistently tied to emotions across all cultures
humans aren't special
we would die if our brains were just a bundle of neurons with no biologically driven behaviors
I've never seen anyone claiming biological sex is not a real thing
lol
flat earth level shit
so basically the argument relies on the assumption that someone that claims biological sex is real assumes they mean humans can only be male or female
and because genetic defects that break the usual male/female classification exist (i don't think anyone denies this) that means the entire classification itself is flawed
the article injects gender expression into that by 1. attacking the science that these people follow in an extremely condescending manner. 2. implying people that think genetics is a factor in society racist/sexist (by showing someone that believes africans are less intelligent by genetics)
3. emphasizing the complexity of biology and making the assumptions of the other side seem naive because they don't have the bigger picture (while not actually showing the bigger picture and relevant research)
now here's what i think
the classification of male/female is extremely useful regardless of the presence of edge cases
there is an extremely high correlation between all of the factors involved, most obvious being that men produce more testosterone regardless of the culture which has many observable effects that we can actually measure by injecting people with testosterone, have penises, don't have boobs, have narrower hips, etc
this might seem obvious to you all but not to the people that wrote that article
sigh
the only ones I give creedence to are the trans folks who have undergone hormone treatment and had surgery, and the hermaphodites
I guess they really want the definition of gender to change
87,357 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 46/874
| Next