Message from @Somi
Discord ID: 451108809105211392
And when he broke the ruling and went and mafe stream in front of court
They just said he broke it and sent him to prison
"Last year Robinson was given a suspended sentence for committing contempt during a rape trial in Canterbury, after he attempted to film the defendants. He had been told that he would go to prison if he broke the law again."
Completely irrelevant.
'if he broke the law again' was yet to be established in a court of law.
And he has the right to be represented by legal council within such a court.
Yeah and since he pleaded guilty
That happened no ?
No
His lawyer wasn't even there
I am no legal expert so cant say how that works
In fact, his laywer had been actively -lied- to about proceedings.
It was very fast for sure
Very fast is an understatement.
I can only say that it sure looks like he broke the suspension on that sentence
So its hard for me imagine him getting away on technicalities with it
Being denied a lawyer or having the state interfere in justice proceedings is hardly a technicality
It's very easy for me
This is a full blown case of criminal mistrial.
He was denied the right to legal council, literally a right equally fundamental to a fair trial as the very concept of 'innocent until proven guilty'
This is not a case of 'oh, his name was spelled 'Tomy' on the official documents so it's mistrial, he goes free'
Well but can you throw the case on those grounds is what i am asking. Because he did broke that suspension and filmed himself doing that
Yes.
Well it will be interesting watching that
In any properly functioning legal system, not only would you be able to throw the case, you would be able to get the judge -barred from office-
Well it did look strange
You'd be able to get so much money in reparations their grand children would still be paying you
Fast track trial with media blackout
But the core of the case
Him breaking the suspension is valid
Again, that wasn't properly established.
Unfortunately
It wasnt properly establiahed but even i can see it happened
He filmed himself doing that
Irrelevant what someone can 'see' happening.
You mean everyone
You can have literally millions of eye witnesses, someone is -innocent- until the opposite is proven by due process in a court of law.
True
Thats the reason why he got into trouble in the first place afterall
But you have to admit that in propper trial he would lose
Again, doubtful, as I've seen plenty of arguments as to why he's innocent.