fake-news
Discord ID: 399204742846349312
10,305 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 13/104
| Next
@BanksyStyle Tim pops in occasionally to get reads on his fans. Once or twice, he's used us to crowdsource. It's definitely not a direct channel to him here, though.
CNN sensationalizing again
so, i have a pixel 2. googles phone. I see this in my news feed: https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2018/05/01/pro-second-amendment-students-plan-school-walkouts/571445002/
So i click copy link. And i get this: https://www.tallahassee.com/story/news/2018/05/01/pro-second-amendment-student-walkouts-planned-wednesday-stand-second/569121002/
So then i do a quick google search in chrome, and get this link: https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.usatoday.com/amp/571445002
which clearly has usa today in its name. links to the usa today story on my phone. but on my computer linkes to the Tallahassee democrat.
@Timcast stuff is strange.
Tina Nguyen for Vanity Fair labeled a bunch of people as "far right" in orginal article http://archive.is/X9XAp#selection-849.79-881.86
>The trend toward conservative influencers has also given a boost to Prager University, a massive media platform that pumps out slickly produced explainer-type videos by far-right firebrands like former Google engineer James Damore, pro-Trump sheriff David Clarke, publishing exec Steve Forbes, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, and National Review editor Jonah Goldberg, all of which somehow manage to coexist. According to Buzzfeed, PragerU, as itโs known, is on track to hit a billion page views in 2018.
https://twitter.com/MaajidNawaz/status/991603592665612288 complaint on twitter by ??? some blue checkmark
Senior writer at Commentary and WSJ jumps on it too: https://twitter.com/SohrabAhmari/status/991607268780146688
Author responds to this https://twitter.com/tina_nguyen/status/991666540469784576
Ben Shapiro Piece about it: https://www.dailywire.com/news/30151/vanity-fair-columnist-kanye-was-seduced-far-right-ben-shapiro
Dave Rubin virtue signalling with all his might: https://twitter.com/RubinReport/status/991703591923613698
New language: https://www.vanityfair.com/news/2018/05/how-kanye-west-was-red-pilled-by-the-far-right
>The trend toward conservative influencers has also given a boost to Prager University, a massive media platform that pumps out slickly produced explainer-type videos by firebrands like former Google engineer James Damore, pro-Trump sheriff David Clarke, publishing exec Steve Forbes, New York Times columnist Bret Stephens, and National Review editor Jonah Goldberg, all of which somehow manage to coexist. According to Buzzfeed, PragerU, as itโs known, is on track to hit a billion page views in 2018.
"Abject drivel from Vanity Fair"
abject drivel. Dave channeling his inner Shapiro?
I used to like Dave, but he's really let himself go
his interviews feel more like gay porn with all the guest dicks he's sucking, and he virtue signals constantly on twitter
oh it didn't happen. only Candace Owens went on. Whew
@itsnotmyfault I... AgReE... wItH tHaT....
I just watched this talk about the origin of fake news. Has anyone else seen this and have thoughts on it?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oa7QvcKYGZA
Above Video Source: Hillsdale Collage.
shame shame @ kanye, I think the one world order could have been taken down in a single interview
This is why we need to keep the communists out. http://www.returnofkings.com/172805/land-is-a-source-of-liberty-and-masculinity?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+ReturnOfKings+%28Return+Of+Kings%29
I know you lads don't think authoritarian rule is a good idea at this point but it's already happening with the goverment spying on you and the like. So the is do you want someone who will save the west or slow the decline?
@AussieAryan#2292 your plan to "save the west" is keep driving towards the same cliff, but just slightly to the right of where its currently headed? yeah, great plan.
That's the thing with authoritarians
They always think it would be their side in power
And forget that on the next cycle you are fucked
do not create weapons that you do not want to see used on yourself
the other thing with authoritarians, they always think the person on their side will put in place exactly what they want. But they rarely do, which usually leads to a line of kill or be killed.
which leads to paranoid people in power, who then start killing and imprisoning people they think are plotting against them
which in turn makes them actual enemies, which just fuels their paranoia
Not all authoritarians are as _good_ as Hitler for getting shit done ๐
i don't think he lasted long enough for shit to get old before he started taking from everyone else to "support" his "good work"
The people who are for authoritarian rule but aren't monsters themselves are the "useful idiots" that go as soon as the new order is established.
These people also tend to forget that its the Authoritarian rule thats driving us downward, the authoritarian rule is causing the decline in the first place.
if you accept those two basic realities, you can't accept an authoritarian government simply because it will either ruin you, or it will kill you, unless you are the monster in which case, you are then the very thing we're fighting against
the only way it will work is if the people who are in power, don't want the power at all, because they will then actively try to remove their own power. Which A. goes against basic human instinct, and B. They simply wont live long enough because they will be killed by those that desire that power
"The road to hell is paved with good intentions"
and the stairway to heaven is made on the bodies of those who gave their freedom so you don't have to
In discussing Authoritarianism and the granting of powers to the government, Count Dankula actually made a poignant note on the matter, and I think this applies to both the Anti-fa and the Anti-com foot soldiers. https://youtu.be/-93pOkVdaTI?t=7m37s
You can roll that ball to the ledge, and give it that last nudge to push it over the edge, that ball of authoritarian control, but once it starts rolling, you will LOSE the ability to stop it.
and then its crushes your car with your kids inside it
What are these good intention you are talking about, grenade?
good is relative so i couldn't really tell you
@Grenade123#5490 I would rather try to save my country and civilization then sit on my ass and juust let it happen. As you said were already going off a cliff and I don't see how fighting for what white people believe in without fighting for the people themsleves. If you have a plan that isn't just muh classical liberalism than I don't see how your helping.
@.B It's either people who think like me, the communists or cultural marxists who will take power. Now tell me which of those do yu think can deal with the problems of the west? The fact is we could slove most of the problems and set our people on the right path again. The society would most likely liberalize to some extent but if the society is homogeneous and dosen't have any jewish influence than that shouldn't be to much of a problem. I know not ever dictator is as good as Hitler but their still better than the democratic leaders we have today.
"good is relative" ๐คข
personally, I gave up
@Deleted User you are a retard
my country is socialist and will continue to be until I die, there's nothing I can do about it
you can do something about it
I'll do what's productive
what country
Portugal
oh lol
I'm migrating to Japan next month
๐
Japan?
thas gay
the amount of girls wanting gaijins don't agree with you
japan is super xenophobic lol
if muslims can migrate to Europe and do nothing productive, why wouldn't the productive people in Europe fish on better waters?
like I care
There's also switzerland.
asians like white dudes
@Deleted User I'd rather not drive off a cliff and not advocating oppression is a good start. Because unlike you, I don't think "the white race" is well defined. And I'm not giving power to people who will find a way to exclude me from the white race if I disagree with their bullshit. Just like any other socialist or communist you don't want to give up power, you want to collect it. And I don't want either of you to have it.
Seriously. It's called pumping the fucking brakes.
And don't give me that fatalist shit that there are only two options: one authoritarian regime or another.
The people in the middle who actually give a shit about freedom, we're not pushovers.
I'm actually curious @Deleted User ,
Who would you trust with the power of life and death over every single person in society, and i don't mean as in "A person who is honest and just and stands up for the rights of white people" no i mean, who of anyone currently alive would you consider able to accomplish this ideal of yours.
So someone who you'd give the power of Stalin, and you honestly trust would give up all this power (their cabinet included) back to the people, and also educated the people enough so as to maintain this ideal world.
Because my biggest issue is that I wouldn't trust anyone other than myself with that level of power, and i can tell you right here i'd turn into Stalin about .48 seconds in and have all these antifa and SJW people hauled to the nearest Gulag
and after that i'd also get rid of a loooot of people because i seriously cba to have that many people be whiny about "ooh you can't do THAT" or "ooh give me stuff" and "ooh i need help" so i'd prolly end up massacaring 60-70% of the population too
cuz with every mass purge you get people who object and resist more and more
That's kind of the thing, isn't it?
It's the rambunctious ones that campaign for an authoritarian regime
but the authoritarian regime requires utterly cucked populations
I know that, you know that, and many here who are anti-authoritarian do too,
But Aussie must have some form of guideline and plan to make this ideal happen, other than "We must fix the problems, and all will be fine"
Because we all have that solution of "Someone godly should come along with How-to and desire to fix it all, and society should work with him"
Well, he either assumes they'll grant authority to the state
I'm just curious how far he worked out how "ideal world" and "reality" can mix
The only way to guarantee your safety from other people is to make all other people no longer a threat. The only way to do that is to kill them. For if they breath, they can still pose a threat.
Eliminate the impure by whatever means they will
and then give the power back to the people?
Or, he's committed to the authoritarian state.
Either one is submission to slavery.
As far as I'm concerned, anyway.
well thats like i said, too vague and idealistic,
because its the same routine "People should fix society" wrapped in a different sentence
I'm curious if he sees anyone currently alive able to do it, some paragon of virtue and justice
The white race can't be extinguished from within, provided we don't give an inch on our civil liberties.
They provide ample means of defense.
By granting our power to the state
it's the ultimate risk.
Oppress a minority, and you'll soon need to oppress the friends or family of the members of those minorities. Oppress the friends and family, and you will have to oppress **their** friends and family. And the recursion continues. Soon the cost of "a few privileged minorities" becomes the majority.
Because the power we grant
could easilly fall into the wrong hands
It could even fall to our enemies.
It's not the path.
Do not create a weapon you can't afford to see used on yourself.
Exactly.
That's the ultimate argument against authoritarianism.
cuz thats the thing with every ideology
An-com: " 'they' should remove government and we'll all be well"
An-cap: " 'they' should remove government and we'll all be well"
Socialist: " 'they' should seize the means of production and remove the bourgoise, and we'll all be well"
Nazi: " 'they' should eliminate the problem causers and remove the jews, and we'll all be well"
Antifa: " 'they' should eliminate the problem causers and remove the bourgoise, and we'll all be well"
etc etc
But none of them lay out a proper plan how to reach "all will be well", cuz they assume somehow society will discover that after removing 'problem' and it will then deploy this perfect plan to create utopia
"The moment the last goym jew fel, NPC white-pope uncovered a secret scroll to build utopia, and all was well"
Civil liberties are essentially our shields. Every single one of them that we preserve for others protects us, as well.
Exactly
To say that Christians can worship as they see fit, for instance
Helps protect my right to ignore christianity.
you're preaching to the choir here you two ๐
We're spelling it out for onlookers.
particular onlookers
Because that particular onlooker thinks that he'll be able to convert us to his side.
10,305 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 13/104
| Next