and after that i'd also get rid of a loooot of people because i seriously cba to have that many people be whiny about "ooh you can't do THAT" or "ooh give me stuff" and "ooh i need help" so i'd prolly end up massacaring 60-70% of the population too

cuz with every mass purge you get people who object and resist more and more

That's kind of the thing, isn't it?

It's the rambunctious ones that campaign for an authoritarian regime

but the authoritarian regime requires utterly cucked populations

I know that, you know that, and many here who are anti-authoritarian do too,

But Aussie must have some form of guideline and plan to make this ideal happen, other than "We must fix the problems, and all will be fine"

Because we all have that solution of "Someone godly should come along with How-to and desire to fix it all, and society should work with him"

Well, he either assumes they'll grant authority to the state

I'm just curious how far he worked out how "ideal world" and "reality" can mix

The only way to guarantee your safety from other people is to make all other people no longer a threat. The only way to do that is to kill them. For if they breath, they can still pose a threat.

Eliminate the impure by whatever means they will

and then give the power back to the people?

Or, he's committed to the authoritarian state.

Either one is submission to slavery.

As far as I'm concerned, anyway.

well thats like i said, too vague and idealistic,

because its the same routine "People should fix society" wrapped in a different sentence

I'm curious if he sees anyone currently alive able to do it, some paragon of virtue and justice

The white race can't be extinguished from within, provided we don't give an inch on our civil liberties.

They provide ample means of defense.

By granting our power to the state

it's the ultimate risk.

Oppress a minority, and you'll soon need to oppress the friends or family of the members of those minorities. Oppress the friends and family, and you will have to oppress **their** friends and family. And the recursion continues. Soon the cost of "a few privileged minorities" becomes the majority.

Because the power we grant

could easilly fall into the wrong hands

It could even fall to our enemies.

It's not the path.

Do not create a weapon you can't afford to see used on yourself.

Exactly.

That's the ultimate argument against authoritarianism.

cuz thats the thing with every ideology

An-com: " 'they' should remove government and we'll all be well"
An-cap: " 'they' should remove government and we'll all be well"
Socialist: " 'they' should seize the means of production and remove the bourgoise, and we'll all be well"
Nazi: " 'they' should eliminate the problem causers and remove the jews, and we'll all be well"
Antifa: " 'they' should eliminate the problem causers and remove the bourgoise, and we'll all be well"

etc etc

But none of them lay out a proper plan how to reach "all will be well", cuz they assume somehow society will discover that after removing 'problem' and it will then deploy this perfect plan to create utopia

"The moment the last goym jew fel, NPC white-pope uncovered a secret scroll to build utopia, and all was well"

Civil liberties are essentially our shields. Every single one of them that we preserve for others protects us, as well.

Exactly

To say that Christians can worship as they see fit, for instance

Helps protect my right to ignore christianity.

you're preaching to the choir here you two 😛

We're spelling it out for onlookers.

particular onlookers

Because that particular onlooker thinks that he'll be able to convert us to his side.

my point was i want to know if Aussie has considered his solution beyond "Someone should fix <problem>, any imo its <problem causers>"

That's valid, and worth knowing. I've just got little patience for it, because I really don't think he knows his ideology.

I'm halfway to thinking that he's actually been a Poe all along.

A Poe?