#general (Discord ID: 463054787336732683) in Subverse, page 844
Security Advisory: Links in messages may lead to maliciously operated websites that could track your IP address and reveal your identity, or they may contain harmful files. The DiscordLeaks team does not check links and cannot make any statements about the safety of following these links.
Some ways to protect yourself are:
- Do not open files downloaded from links, and do not run any programs that try to download themselves to your computer.
- Use anonymization measures such as Tor Browser or a VPN.
If you are using the Privacy Badger or other privacy extensions, you may need to whitelist Discord and related domains in order for the images to load.
Amy Schummer just got arrested
Apparently she was asked if she wanted to be arrested.
You need to get consent of course
it would be rape otherwise
Could have been one of those PR stunts.
She looks like Ursula now.
Fat beached whale gets arrested for sperging out at capital hill
🎵 POOR UNFORTUNATE SOULS. 🎵
these people are so retarded
getting arrested for this
they are so desperate for a crusade and to be like their hippy boomer parents
Staged arrest, all part of the political game
What will they do once the FBI clears Kavanaugh and arrest Ford?
Will they care?
Scream into the sky
it's like they're possessed they will just double down and attack the FBI
The West has a big mental health problem
lack of values lack of responsibility lack of meaning constant pursuit of decadence
both sides use the fbi as a scapegoat
Oh man it’s THE BIG DOG ROMAN REIGNS
fbi investigates hilary ......gop yas queen dem's....this is a hit job fbi investigates trump.........dem's.... yas queen gop..this is nothing but hilary's deep state cronies who found a big nothing burger
Hillary is a dotard
Pizza Gate is an everything burger
and David Hogg did 9/11
whats this i hear of a whale getting arrested?
David Hogg did 7/11
Until SJWs started to happen, I never know what people hated about the hippies so much.
"Oh they were just about peace and stupid clothes? Jesus could you people stop being such shits over nothing?"
No one went into this kinda detail.
WE BEEN COMPROMISED
Someone pm tim
Sweet fcuking christ why does pol gonna. E right all the time
Since a ton of people who used to be hippies are super anti-sjw
Like Christina Hoff Sommers
People call me a hippy all the time. Just coz I want everyone to get along and don't want to piss around in other people business.
Hippies are the people who sit on couches and do drugs, if you give them that, they're happy
SJW's sit on couches, rejecting drugs cuz they wanna be imaginary sick, and whatever you give them they'll be angry
And the long hair.
Look what I got through the post yesterday.
Oh look, a free surveillance device
how nice of them
People who buy Alexas or Echos are 🐑
Got a cow shed 50 yards from me. Could stick it in there. Fibre would be nice though.
Think these are old ones with bugs that they can't sell so are giving away?
50 yards is close enough that it'll pick up shouting
Just take a heavy object and firmly apply it to the lizardtech
unrelated, have dog
:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
The President of Interpol has gone missing in China
let's just hope he never drank any coke
Are we a fan of the "Big if true" meme in the Tim Pool discord
Place your bets. 100 page confession or slipped and landed on 3 bullets.
"No we swear he's still in the consolate lol" - Turkey and probably China
@Rabbi Shekels I won't have a smart phone, I would never have one of those things in my house.
Wait so you dont have a amazon echo ?
No, It's an offer. Get a free echo with BT fibre.
I was discussing Brett with a far left friend the other day. He gave me this link.
I read through it and came away with a far different take away
He believes it says and the video shows that this ex scotus judge thinks Brett is biased and should not be chosen.
However when I read it I came away with the opinion that this judge thinks Brett is qualified. Just that when half of the country attacks him. He is no longer unbiased to half the country
Ah John Paul Stevens, he's been rather politically active for a former justice recently. He's the one who thought we should get rid of the 2nd amendment
You're probably reading it finer than your friend.
It's hammer time!
His response to my opinion.
Let us not argue about this, or other political things. I appreciate a bit of debate but as i said elsewhere, i dont support him because Trump.
Lol. Yeah, that's logic for you.
Wait, but bias is on part of the judge, not on part of people judging HIM.
100% of the population can think him biased, but he still wouldn't have to be.
Whether he is biased is in HIS application of the law, not someone's else's view.
I am totally confused.
"protect the institution from the perception of bias"
From the perception of bias?
I'd rather protect it from actual bias.
Which is never going to really happen as long as the politicians politicize the nomination process.
Yeah well, the news media has a bias that it wants implemented.
It sure does.
I'd rather have a fair judge that everyone thinks biased than the other way around.
Well, goodie gum drops.
Unfortunately, the left tends (and has really always tended) towards "win by any means necessary" for some time and has politicized the courts for decades.
And they'll fight over any ground they can.
So they're fighting to control the courts.
I am unsure what the negative outcome is from perceived court bias.
Much of it is is due to accepting equality of outcome.
I think it's actually deeper.
Equality of outcome was not even fair if I was the only one subject to it.
It is due to a belief in "caring for the weak" and being morally justified in everything.
If I did twice as much work than the year prior, I'd expect to get paid twice as much.
you know fellas
My pay does not even have to compare to anyone else's.
sometimes Donald Trump is not that great
"The right sees the left as wrong; the left sees the right as evil."
Equality of outcome is one of the most harebrained economic models you could choose.
It only sounds fair to a toddler.
As such the left believes it is the hero and will do anything it needs to win.
Equality of outcome for unequal work means that whoever worked harder got less per unit of time!
Actually, it doesn't even seem fair to toddlers. We have experiments proving toddlers hate equality of outcome.
It's only fair to statisticians, bureaucrats and academics
Who more or less control everything these days.
But, basic arithmetic is not the strong suite of so-called egalitarians.
Oh, and HR types and Union faithful.
Wait, so even toddlers don't like it?
Nope. They believe in something usually called "fairness" in the literature.
What are we doing to so-called adults to miswire their brains that badly then?
Which is closer to equal rewards for equal precieved effort.
Which is what most adults want too.
offer them "free money"
Yes, that I can have some sympathy for.
Equality of outcome is very convenient for people who do statistics (it's relatively easy to test) and bureaucrats (you get paid on the plan)
I think equal rewards for equal perceived effort is evil
I think there are also very strange misperceptions of where prices come from.
It's also convenienent for people who don't really want to work or otherwise obsess over equality.
Yes PERCEIVED effort, that would be a bad thing.
But not as bad as equality of outcome.
Your perception might be off, but at least you are TRYING to do the right thing.
The vast majority of people don't have even a cursory understanding of economics.
CA and NYC are looking at rent control again, for example.
With equality of outcome, you are not even TRYING to do the right thing.
Equal reward for equal value generation.
So the thing about perceived effort is that people don't even realize it's the perception.
Yes, and that comparative value is measured through prices.
If two things have the same price, it is supposed to mean that, by and large, people would be willing to exchange the two.
And if it is not the case for you, you can exchange the thing of higher price for cash and buy the other item that is priced the same, but which you value less.
If they believe that there is good reason to trust what people say about effort, they'll bite.
The problem is that "equal effort for equal reward" (the actual ideal) is marred the fact specialization hides the effort alot of people put into things and the fact that not all labor is equal.
Capitalists trust price signals. Communists don't.
Heres a missing concept people often overlook
Leftwingers see "time spent" as the value
Rightwngers see "resource contributed" as the value
If a person works 1 hour on a machine, to create 10x the product
One side wants them paid for 1 hour
The other wants them paid 10x for the resource
And since they see Rich people as working just as long as minimum wage people
Equality of outcome seems fair to them
I often hear the rhetoric question "How do you put a price on X?" Well, the same way you put a price on anything else!
The value of a thing is whatever people would be willing to exchange it for.
@Dr.Wol It's worse than that. You know why the USSR and China didn't get along? Mao believed agricultural labor was more representative of the working class. Stalin believed that was industrial labor. They didn't get along.
And that's endemic everywhere on the left.
It doesn't matter if the monetary price has a few more zeroes or not.
You can print as much money as you want, but in a decently working market economy, things of equal value will end up with around the same price.
Alright you guys, start fightin'.
Michigan Union types think Californian Actors Guild members are lazy bumfucks who get all the accolades for doing nothing valuable. The Californain Actor Guilds think the Automakers union members are deplorables.
But we haven't had enough beer, yet.
And where are the ice cubes to throw at each other?!
This should help.
What kind of mosh pit is this?!
@Undead Mockingbird Exactly. Money isn't the important signal. It's all in the relative pricing of resources.
The economy is a distribution system. Not a money system.
people have a different concept of money
Some see it as a commodity, if you have lots of money you can do a lot, you can print it, you can steal etc its just an object with value
Others see it as a compensation of work
If there are 4 coconuts on an island and there are $100 in circulation, each coconut is worth $25. If there's $1000, they each are worth $250.
Is the sand worth nothing
Is labor worth nothing?
the coconut is as much worth as i'm willing to pay for it
Can you get new coconuts?
How much labor do you have to invest to get a cocounut?
That's your cost of labor.
Good luck opening the coconut in such a way that you keep all the milk.
This gives the rocks worth.
Gotta find a good rock.
And there's the complexities of real world markets coming in.
But it's not like we just pick prices.
That's why it's so hard to centrally plan price signals.
thats because central planning revolves around assuming people will pay for a fixed price
What we just hashed out packs more understanding of economics into the space of two pages than the entire knowledge of Marxist economies.
It also assumes the cost of production is entirely predictable, for every product in the field you control
Marxism has no economy
This is why Hayek calls it hubris. There's no conceivable way that a central authority can know the intimate details of every transaction to the point where they aren't throwing darts at the proverbial board
this is why all those commie people / ideas in business always fail
Entirely blind lol
Well, what if there was?
Have you guys seen Death of Stalin. lol
Let's say we have enough computing power to do so.
Let's write a computer program that perfectly allocates resources.
I've been tempted to go watch it
The Marxist Dream Machine!
I can't argue on the base of "what if there was"
Cuz you can apply that to anything
"What if there was no corruption"
But I don't really watch movies much
It's like a classic Monty Python film.
There's even a python in it.
What would it do? It would just end up simulating a free market economy.
A complete redundancy.
Well no, they want the ability to curb stuff they don't like
That's the whole point of it
And, anyway, we use plenty of algorithms to predict market prices already.
Yes, but stuff they don't like is part of the market.
I don't like that people spend hundreds of dollars on a Britney Spears concert.
But that's not a failure of capitalism.
It's a moral failure.
It's your mom's failure.
No disagreement there.
You can't talk about me mum like that.
Take it back.
people spending hundreds of dollars on Britney Spears concert is capitalism at work
Actually, that's one of the things people miss.
Okay, I take it back.
It's just shit taste
We spend more on entertainment than healthcare.
But somehow healthcare is the problem.
Your mom is a powerful and strong womman. Stunning and brave.
Its the very definition of capitalism,
People work, put in labor, and get paid,
And then spend that money on what THEY wanna spend it on.
Free market at work
I am Canadian so I disagree with that assessment
Even though I think if you stopped someone in the street if Hollywood or the hospital was more important, almost all of them would prefer the hospital.
You saying scribbles mom is a liar?
Yes, but Canadians don't count.
You can't talk about me mum like that either!
We keep you savages up north for a reason.
Spending more on entertainment than healthcarr
I was agreeing with scrib. People pouring stupid amounts of cash to watch Britany Spears is a moral failure.
US spends more on medical than we do iirc
How is it a moral failure?
But we still spend even more on entertainment.
Many people compare absolute numbers, which is very wrong.
But only one of these is under the gun for "costing too much"
You always have to compare per capita.
Right but Joe was saying "as a Canadian". We spend even less on medical
I spend more tax dollars proportioned toward health care and paying the cigarette tax for my mother in laws habbits than I do on entertainment.
Probably a proportional amount on entertainment. Concert tickets get fucking nuts
How is it a moral failure?
Its their money
Yes, but are Canadians really the same species? Should we compare them to humans?
It's not absolute down to the last person
I don't compare my vet to a medical doctor.
go fuck yourself
It's a general assessment
Overall entertainment gets more cash than many much more important things