Told you

😛

Look what I got through the post yesterday.

Oh look, a free surveillance device

how nice of them

Smash it

People who buy Alexas or Echos are 🐑

@Poppy Rider take the offer, then thoroughly disassemble the thing

Got a cow shed 50 yards from me. Could stick it in there. Fibre would be nice though.

Think these are old ones with bugs that they can't sell so are giving away?

50 yards is close enough that it'll pick up shouting

Just take a heavy object and firmly apply it to the lizardtech

unrelated, have dog

:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>

:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>

Oh shit

The President of Interpol has gone missing in China

Really?

oh dear.

let's just hope he never drank any coke

https://apnews.com/af741e061cfe40f9b80a252a2bfc0a46

Are we a fan of the "Big if true" meme in the Tim Pool discord

It's used.

Place your bets. 100 page confession or slipped and landed on 3 bullets.

"No we swear he's still in the consolate lol" - Turkey and probably China

@Poppy Rider that shit is gonna narc on you

@Rabbi Shekels I won't have a smart phone, I would never have one of those things in my house.

Wait so you dont have a amazon echo ?

No, It's an offer. Get a free echo with BT fibre.

I was discussing Brett with a far left friend the other day. He gave me this link.

http://amp.timeinc.net/time/5416084/john-paul-stevens-brett-kavanaugh

I read through it and came away with a far different take away

He believes it says and the video shows that this ex scotus judge thinks Brett is biased and should not be chosen.

However when I read it I came away with the opinion that this judge thinks Brett is qualified. Just that when half of the country attacks him. He is no longer unbiased to half the country

Ah John Paul Stevens, he's been rather politically active for a former justice recently. He's the one who thought we should get rid of the 2nd amendment

You're probably reading it finer than your friend.

It's hammer time!

His response to my opinion.

Let us not argue about this, or other political things. I appreciate a bit of debate but as i said elsewhere, i dont support him because Trump.

Lol. Yeah, that's logic for you.

Wait, but bias is on part of the judge, not on part of people judging HIM.

100% of the population can think him biased, but he still wouldn't have to be.

Whether he is biased is in HIS application of the law, not someone's else's view.

I am totally confused.