It skyrocketed Peterson into another dimension.

And simulated rape on them with cucumbers

Bret reported it multiple times

Wrote several articles and an editorial

It resulted in him gaining a ton of enemies, losing a lot of his friends

There was no foreseeable value I see so far in him doing so

He took the people who did it, to court

And got them suspended

All done selflessly

Another example I like, is Gandhi in Champaran

There was a village called Champaran, a very fertile land

Under the East India company, the farmers were forced to grow indigo on their farms

But, when Germany made synthetic indigo

The farm grown, organic indigo dropped a lot in value

Resulted in no one buying the farmers' crops

And a lot of them starting to starve since the meagre amount of money they earned was spent in taxes

Honesty pays but it pays slowly.

Same Intellectual Dark Web Bret?

They asked for Gandhi's help

@GingaBomber Yes

I didnt hear of the prostitute thing

And Gandhi went to the landlords, acting as farmer's representative

His colleagues in the Congress, like Nehru, advised him not to go, threatened to leave his movement if he did

Gandhi organised the farmers, made them act out in civil disobedience

And when he was arrested, he used his popularity, starving himself in prison

Eventually, the landlords gave the farmers back the land, waived a third off their taxes

So your definition of honor is stand to lose more than you gain

No not really

What I'm describing isn't honor

Morals?

I'm describing what I consider a "self less act"

I personally believe Honor is stupid

Isnt the ability to act selflessly a part of honor?

And often used as a facade to hide cowardice

No not really

Because Honor defers

From society to society

It's a stupid concept for the weak and the indoctrinated

Me and ayn Rand would have been the best of friends lmao

Just sounds rather nihilist to me to be honest

Lol probably

I don't know if I'm a nihilist, per say

Since I appreciate the value of ideologies and religions

And I'm definitely not a post modernist

Priyanka Chopra is a paedo. Prove me wrong, Shiv.

Idfk man

I never liked her

Nick Jonas is like 14

Okay

I don't like Nick Jonas either

I like the twink Jonas brother

Me neither. Im glad he's getting paedoed

Who is in DNCE

What's his name

Joe?

No idea. I need to study up on the Jonas bois

Twink Jonas makes good music

I met Shilpa Shetty's cousin once.

That's it. Story over.

I pulled her actually. Rachana. But she was like a decade older than me so ignored my attempts to contact her in the days after 😭

@GingaBomber Bret talked about the prostitute thing in the Joe Rogan episode

Must be a while ago

Timothy Pool > Joseph Rogan.

Easy.

Ye

how much you wanna bet Joe Rogan has tiny balls

... What the damn is wrong with you

Heheheheheh

Tiny balls are better than no balls. Hitler only had one and it was probably tiny.

Alex Jones has an ingrown penis #TrooFax

Soon I'll be able to turn the page on my Alex Jones topless calendar. Almost August.

baaaawls?

If you swallow a potato whole without chewing it then a potato tree can start growing inside your stomach.

technically your throat, cuz it will be stuck there, and you die, so you wont poop it out within 48 hours

If you eat a Beanie, you become Tim Pool for 7 minutes

wait is that true

<:beanie:463084349642899468>

only if you survive it tho

100% true can confirm

I ate a beanie and then went into CNN with an army of drones wearing my Google glass ™

tim said a thing about authoretarian government being more efficient then kappatalism, he is wrong. getting someone to mop a floor using money is better then pointing a gun at him. here is why
gun: you gotta stick around to point it at him (cost of enforcement)
gun: YOU gotta stick around, you waste your time watching someone else mop a floor (cost of time)
gun: person moping the floor wont get anything from it, if you make him do that all the time they will starve, or you have to take care of their needs too (cost of keeping slaves)
gun: people will not want to mop your floors because they dont get anything for it, so you gotta go out looking for them (cost of searching for talent)

money: you gotta give the person access to the area he needs to mop, thats it, no need to stick around

money: you dont have to stick around, a worker and the quality of their work are tied, if he does a bad job he wont be asked to come again. no incentive to not do it right

money: they get to take care of themselves, they do the job and leave, no need to think about it anymore

I pose the argument of scale.

money: you offer money for a job, people that want the money will come find you

no, thats how YOU'd do it

You don't have to stick around, you just have to know his identity, so that if the floor isn't cleaned, you go find him and kill him
Also, if you force him to, you can ahve him mop for 14-15 hours per day
As opposed to 8 hours from the money working person

So even at 75% efficiency compared to capitalist, he'll still be mopping more

You can also disarm him and then set a number of managers to monitor several people mopping floors.

If you're paying you still need management.

aite, why should the managers do their jobs? will you keep an eye on them, or are you paying them?

keep in mind, you are now pointing a gun at someone with a gun, if you go that route

"Any number of people can be managed if you divide them correctly" - Sun Tzu (in reference to military hierarchies)

no, the manager doesn't have a gun

why does the mopper do his job then?

cuz you send a KGB level agent after him if he doesn't

you don't have to directly threaten him

he just has to know the threat is there to follow

how do you make sure the agent does his job

the ratio of commissars in the soviet union wasn't 1 : 1 with the population

do you point a gun at him?