That's it. Story over.

I pulled her actually. Rachana. But she was like a decade older than me so ignored my attempts to contact her in the days after 😭

@GingaBomber Bret talked about the prostitute thing in the Joe Rogan episode

Must be a while ago

Timothy Pool > Joseph Rogan.

Easy.

Ye

how much you wanna bet Joe Rogan has tiny balls

... What the damn is wrong with you

Heheheheheh

Tiny balls are better than no balls. Hitler only had one and it was probably tiny.

Alex Jones has an ingrown penis #TrooFax

Soon I'll be able to turn the page on my Alex Jones topless calendar. Almost August.

baaaawls?

If you swallow a potato whole without chewing it then a potato tree can start growing inside your stomach.

technically your throat, cuz it will be stuck there, and you die, so you wont poop it out within 48 hours

If you eat a Beanie, you become Tim Pool for 7 minutes

wait is that true

<:beanie:463084349642899468>

only if you survive it tho

100% true can confirm

I ate a beanie and then went into CNN with an army of drones wearing my Google glass ™

tim said a thing about authoretarian government being more efficient then kappatalism, he is wrong. getting someone to mop a floor using money is better then pointing a gun at him. here is why
gun: you gotta stick around to point it at him (cost of enforcement)
gun: YOU gotta stick around, you waste your time watching someone else mop a floor (cost of time)
gun: person moping the floor wont get anything from it, if you make him do that all the time they will starve, or you have to take care of their needs too (cost of keeping slaves)
gun: people will not want to mop your floors because they dont get anything for it, so you gotta go out looking for them (cost of searching for talent)

money: you gotta give the person access to the area he needs to mop, thats it, no need to stick around

money: you dont have to stick around, a worker and the quality of their work are tied, if he does a bad job he wont be asked to come again. no incentive to not do it right

money: they get to take care of themselves, they do the job and leave, no need to think about it anymore

I pose the argument of scale.

money: you offer money for a job, people that want the money will come find you

no, thats how YOU'd do it

You don't have to stick around, you just have to know his identity, so that if the floor isn't cleaned, you go find him and kill him
Also, if you force him to, you can ahve him mop for 14-15 hours per day
As opposed to 8 hours from the money working person

So even at 75% efficiency compared to capitalist, he'll still be mopping more

You can also disarm him and then set a number of managers to monitor several people mopping floors.

If you're paying you still need management.

aite, why should the managers do their jobs? will you keep an eye on them, or are you paying them?

keep in mind, you are now pointing a gun at someone with a gun, if you go that route

"Any number of people can be managed if you divide them correctly" - Sun Tzu (in reference to military hierarchies)

no, the manager doesn't have a gun

why does the mopper do his job then?

cuz you send a KGB level agent after him if he doesn't

you don't have to directly threaten him

he just has to know the threat is there to follow

how do you make sure the agent does his job

the ratio of commissars in the soviet union wasn't 1 : 1 with the population