general
Discord ID: 392478767274262529
30,721 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 9/308
| Next
12th,14th, 16th, 17th,19th, 24th,26th @ebowden
Fun fact on that. Do you know what god was always pissed about in the old testament?
We need to get rid of the slave labor we're relying on
That's true dino.
I am for a new amendment to permanently close borders to immigration
And expel all non citizens
@ebowden what is your stance on immigration?
What fucking nutjob here wanted slavery to be legal?
imagrants are gay
What immigration?
All immigration
yes all imagration
Into America
I don't know about permanently closing the borders, but this illegal immigrant shit needs to stop.
For me at least
<#392485988024320001>
Permanently closing is the only way to stop demographic replacement
Nations have a right to determine who enters their country, for any reason, wise or unwise.
It is part of sovereignty.
Close the borders indefinitely until things are sorted out
Illegals deported etc
America has ceased to be a nation
It is just a state
See i'd support a law that streamlined immigration. But it would have to include a roundup of all current illegals, their deportation, and blacklisting for citizenship and any future children they may have.
No
It isn't just the illegals
It's says so on paper but tell me why do you think it's not being practiced?
It's all immigration
I do not believe in punishing children for the sins of their parents.
All non-white immigration
What a faggot thing to say
Laziness and misplaced compassion.
It's a front for Israel and multinational corporations
Laziness? Compassion? It's a simple principle.
Blacklisting them from U.S. citizenship is not legally a "punishment" is what I would argue in that case.
But I thought you believed in the constitution?
o shit
an otomatone
ye
It's me
Laziness because laws can be difficult and expensive to enforce.
Not punishing children for the sins of their parents is against the constitution?
HAHAHAHAHA
The way you frame it is wrong
I believe that although it may be more compassionate, letting children of illegals be citizens just incentivizes people to use their kids as anchors, which hardly strikes me as being more compassionate
It is simply putting them.back where they belong.
Anchor babies do not have the right to be here.
Why should I struggle to care for my family because someone else's culture is shit?
Misplaced compassion because some people think we need to solve all the world's problems. When all we really do is be a pressure release valve for countries to avoid fixing their own problems.
If you are born in the US you have the right to be there, or is that not always the case legally?
If you stop birthright citizenship for children of illegals, the anchor baby shit will stop immediately
It wasn't always
@ebowden not before 1965
It was originally restricted to Western European stock
If we shut down Mexican immigration in it's entirety, Mexico would short it's shit out in ten years or less.
And then the 16th amendment changed that
Isn't it more compassionate to help people in their countries to make it better instead of allowing them to be here? How will their nations get better?
Oh, well having more freedom doesn't bother me. I don't want racial policy.
Or be a smoking crater everyone blames on whitey.
But most of the world is that already so we've got nothing to lose.
@ebowden are you a jew?
Fucking lol
Why are you asking me this?
I say we bomb the cartels. It helps both Mexico and us
I think everyone should have to pass a civics test, just like we expect foreigners to. Maybe then people would actually know how our fucking government works.
I'm tired of assholes with a sub high school level civics education bitching about the electoral college
@Dinosorcerer because immigrants don't vote Democrat overwhelmingly or anything
So, who was the crazy fuck who wanted slavery legalised?
I don't recall anyone saying that.
Moore condone it
Seems to've glazed over
Western wingman wanted the 14th gone I think?
He said he wanted every amendment past 10 repealed, not necessarily the same
he also said "america was at it's best during slavery"
It was, minus the slavery part
WHAT A NAME WITH THAT MESSAGE
Lol!
๐๐
@Constantine which one of my points is that in reference to?
@Dinosorcerer Roy Moore
I said the 14th
Not the 13th
I never said anything about roy moore
I just told her hahahaaha and she blocked me.
@Valet the Clown who?
Serpico what are you on about
The 3rd is pretty useless nowadays
Serpico was talking to a leaf
Only while we don't have a war on our soil @Nottheonlymoron
Serpico trolling some leaf
we're probably not going to have one for a'hile
Grumplebee said:
Firstly birthright citizenship if at least one parent is already a citzen. Second, rights DO NOT apply to non citizens in any way shape or form.
Non citizen? Slavery is a-ok. Go full Rome on em
hmm may want to rethink that
30,721 total messages. Viewing 100 per page.
Prev |
Page 9/308
| Next