Only 23k subs

Because let us consider the perspective of the sjw types, because they have a solution in their own eyes, & it is the one they need to do in their perspective to accomplish some thing.

Don't agree with her 100% but she's alright

oh yeah i think ive heard of her, liana k had a small role in the gamergate controversy

You guys know the kavanaugh hearings are just a show right ?

Dude is already going to get confirmed because repubs have the house

Yes

I feel like some people thought different like the protestors

You know, I am real happy the Americans got the lead out of their petrol despite corporate lobbying.

"A common solution" then da Britain

if you wanna get that level of specific on what i said 😛

What are common solutions?

Liana K is a bit weird. Like she's usually pretty rational and then occasionally she just throws a big curveball that you'd never expect from her. Like last time I heard of her she was in favor of Count Dankula's charges.

a common solution is one that both sides can be happy with

like if Hitler arose, both left and right in america would agree to get rid of him

A common solution 😉

As a centrist I believe we should have Hitler in *some* power.

That is not a common solution wol, that is a common goal.

Portuguese hitler, ruler of a lazy country full of gay people 🤔

Stopping Naziism is the goal, killing the iconic fuhrer is the solution

Well didn’t you say that a goal is the core of problems?

*“a goal is bad, a goal is too vague and can become tainted”*

yes, cuz a goal is only an aim

A solution actually has steps to getting there

A goal:
End poverty
Achieve social equality
Opportunity for everyone

A common solution:
More jobs than workers, so wages go up
Stop categorising people by an arbitrary criterea
Free market anyone can enter/leave

cuz the goal of ending poverty can also have as a solution "Take from the rich and give to the poor (socialism)" but its not much of a solution for the rich who just lose out

so its not a solution for both

I mean i might phrase it poorly, but you understand what i mean

having just a goal, is bad because it can get tainted

Then how do implement your solutions you proposed without it way that both sides agree on? Because the socialist solution is one thing & yours is another. You in the end don’t have a solution in common even if you have a goal in common.

then its not a common solution

Most of the west has a common goal, they just differ on how to achieve it

take Healthcare for example

the Left wants it paid by the state taxes

The Right wants healthcare made cheap by having a highly competative market taht forces prices down to compete

But neither side is saying "We must ban healthcare for every individual"

"People should die if they get sick"

https://twitter.com/CassandraRules/status/1037507570724945921?s=09

Because at this point there is a problem with the solution even if the goal is fine.

thats because both sides have a different solution

@Beemann Here you go. I should say Inside Higher Ed is extremely reliable, it's the more tabloid-y of the two main Higher Ed-focused periodicals (the other being The Chronicle of Higher Ed).

It does look like I was confusing it with something else.

https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2018/02/06/controversial-event-university-chicago-law-school-called

:shirt: Check out **Tim Pool's TeeSpring Merch**:
<https://teespring.com/stores/timcast>

:dollar: Support **Tim Pool** on Patreon (exclusive rewards available):
<https://www.patreon.com/timcast>