Message from @Dusty Morgan
Discord ID: 492328267194564620
Porn I think has a slightly different set of rules around it, so porn might still be able to be removed. And bans might still be allowed (it's like a library deciding not to have a book)
Wait now. Removing porn is moderating.
Spam would be be allowed, but it doesn't mean the user cannot have mute and block features
Except the president.
Removing illegal posts is not moderation by the platform, and it they don't claim the to be a porn site
What I'm trying to get at here is that there are lots and lots of ways that this can go wrong and we need to consider them.
Yes ^
If you want to see what 'no moderation except illegal stuff' looks like, go to /b/.
Right, and adding more laws won't be a problem
Would a site code of conduct be allowed?
Memba wen /b/ was good?
I don't think social media is helpful much at all.
So i don't really care if it dies.
But i think removing laws is better before adding new ones.
Let's not advocate for our own article 13
90% this
But yes, you might need to modify the old laws slightly to outline what level of stuff is considered editing/moderating and what isn't
But 230 should be removed
Because right now the government is the one protecting conservatives from really suing Twitter and Facebook and the like.
>Tim's annoyed that customers are giving companies customer feedback that their listening of a minority group outside their customer base is causing them to stop buying their products
Thankfully he is doing something about it. Exposing these people and their agenda, bringing attention to it.
About fucking time someone did something.
Dow Jones and S&P all time high
Investigating journalist.
Latest video from Project Varitas.
The common thread between these epople.
He's right when he says privacy belongs to the people and transparency belongs to the government. Currently it's completely reversed.
They are doing this activist work for DSA and breaking rules for the DSA.
Maybe it is time to declare the DSA domestic threat.
I wonder what percentage of DSA government workers abuse their position. Would not surprise me if it was the vast majority.
There should be something done about it.
DSA is actively trying to stage a coup.
It's the KGB defectors warning in action.
Okay. I admit it, Democrats are better than the DSA which is radical threat.
DSA needs to be taken down.
now that you mention it. I wonder how many DSA people are in the democratic party. Their presence would explain why they've fallen for Id. pol.
As well as activist bureaucrats (and really worryingly) activist legal professionals
I think most if not all DSA members are part of the Democratic party.