Message from @Dusty Morgan
Discord ID: 492328687795044362
If you want to see what 'no moderation except illegal stuff' looks like, go to /b/.
Right, and adding more laws won't be a problem
Would a site code of conduct be allowed?
Memba wen /b/ was good?
I don't think social media is helpful much at all.
So i don't really care if it dies.
But i think removing laws is better before adding new ones.
Let's not advocate for our own article 13
90% this
But yes, you might need to modify the old laws slightly to outline what level of stuff is considered editing/moderating and what isn't
But 230 should be removed
Because right now the government is the one protecting conservatives from really suing Twitter and Facebook and the like.
>Tim's annoyed that customers are giving companies customer feedback that their listening of a minority group outside their customer base is causing them to stop buying their products
Thankfully he is doing something about it. Exposing these people and their agenda, bringing attention to it.
About fucking time someone did something.
Dow Jones and S&P all time high
Investigating journalist.
The common thread between these epople.
He's right when he says privacy belongs to the people and transparency belongs to the government. Currently it's completely reversed.
They are doing this activist work for DSA and breaking rules for the DSA.
Maybe it is time to declare the DSA domestic threat.
I wonder what percentage of DSA government workers abuse their position. Would not surprise me if it was the vast majority.
There should be something done about it.
DSA is actively trying to stage a coup.
It's the KGB defectors warning in action.
Okay. I admit it, Democrats are better than the DSA which is radical threat.
DSA needs to be taken down.
now that you mention it. I wonder how many DSA people are in the democratic party. Their presence would explain why they've fallen for Id. pol.
As well as activist bureaucrats (and really worryingly) activist legal professionals
I think most if not all DSA members are part of the Democratic party.
But once they get into power they will change the party.
The non DSA democrats are just being useful idiots for the socialists.
Sounds about right.
DSA is scheming their way to power through the Democratic party, that is why they went from Socialist Party of America to Democrat Socialist of America.
They are currently undermining the current administrating and position to control Democrats, that is why we are seeing old Democrats being replaced by new Democrats that can be controlled by the DSA.
They are piggy back riding off the Democrats name to gain more power.
Republicans and Conservatives should take them serious, they should also work with Democrats who are resisting the DSA.