I want to feast upon the chickenfolk

@Raelis Nice idéologique you follow. But I disagree to an extent.

Wanna elaborate?

I’m not saying I’m perfect of course but I’m just curious

You spoke that you cared for people, and that they shouldn’t harm themselves, that’s dangerous.

The weak need to fall, to fail, to face hardship, because it makes them confront the struggles they face in life. And if they overcome that struggle, it’ll be because of their own strength, and they’ll be stronger for it.

What you’ll do, is rob them of that battle. You’ll cheapen it, making them dependent on the strength of others to help themselves overcome their struggles, and they’ll never learn to use their own strength because of it.

Without hardship, we never learn anything.

However, you mentioned you’re also one of the conservative types, what ideologies do you believe in?

It is curious, as every ideological group always says as if in unison if not a robotic programmed speech, they all *care for people*.

Opinion: we should bring back gladiatorial games, but In the form of punishment, reserved for murderers, serial killers, rapists, pedophiles, terrorists, etc.

Take my Denarii’

And I believe that regular people should be allowed to volunteer to participate if they want.

🤔

@Deleted User

https://lparchive.org/King-of-Dragon-Pass-(by-Haifisch)/Update%20251/2-capture_001_01112012_093750.png

Wtf

Such a good game

What kind of game is this lol

A very old game

Basically you start out as a little clan and work towards uniting as a tribe or even a king if you play a long game

It's turnbased resource management with "visual novel" elements I guess you can call it, which I don't think is a fair term, since it's so much more tbh

Good ethnonationalist elements

If you want to go that route of course

King of Dragonpass

Sounds like Banner Saga

I haven't played that

You should try this and let me know if it is :^)

Being gay is bad mmkay

If yoy go by historical context wouldnt the first amendment protect citizens discussing when and if its time for a boogaloo? I mean wasnt thomas paines common sense a call yo arms?

To*

Yeah, the only thing that isn't allowed is directly threatening to kill someone.

Or threatening to kill a group specifically.

Hmmm i see so no gassing the jews 😞😄

Threatening involves both implied intent as well as actual intent to attempt so

Saying "I'm going to fucking shoot you in the chest" is A-Okay

As long as I don't actually get my gun and start driving to your house with the intent to shoot you in the chest

Or do something to make you think that I am

Yeah, there has to be reasonable suspicion that you actually meant it.

If i say " were gonna commit a crime" is that too generalised?

Would you have to say im going to punch a muslim?