Message from @AdorableStormtrooper

Discord ID: 521328591569682442


2018-12-09 14:09:29 UTC  

um, British, Canadian, Australian, New Zealand, and a few other countries, not just "england" (england being a country that hasnt been an independant political entity since the early 1600s)

2018-12-09 14:09:42 UTC  

I find monarchs in the west disgusting,

They get a royal salary
They're allowed to gain interest,
AND all their expenses are paid for by the government (aka the taxpayers)

So the monarchy is making money, and spending none

2018-12-09 14:10:23 UTC  

I agree, monarchs need to retake control of their national governments. The current structure renders them little more than bloated ticks.

2018-12-09 14:10:24 UTC  

actually after the pact signed by george III they technically lose money

2018-12-09 14:10:33 UTC  

expenses incurred whilst on public duty, or staying in publically owned residences

2018-12-09 14:10:34 UTC  

good

2018-12-09 14:10:37 UTC  

the dutch one is making bank

2018-12-09 14:10:52 UTC  

Monarchs in the West are disgusting tbh

2018-12-09 14:10:55 UTC  

they lose about 210m a year

2018-12-09 14:10:57 UTC  

#notall

2018-12-09 14:11:14 UTC  

if they abdicated the throne they would make a lot more

2018-12-09 14:11:23 UTC  

so, Zuckerberg gonna buy Buckingham Palace in 2030 yes? 😉

2018-12-09 14:11:39 UTC  

hopefully not

2018-12-09 14:11:59 UTC  

that's a messed up vision u just gave me

2018-12-09 14:12:03 UTC  

😄

2018-12-09 14:12:45 UTC  

Thats the thing tho with Monarchies, you cannot buy them unlike Politicians, they already have everything

2018-12-09 14:13:09 UTC  

This was often brought up as a positive when Donald Trump ran for president.

2018-12-09 14:13:14 UTC  

Aristocrats used to be less wealthy than the Merchants even then they had more power in practice

2018-12-09 14:13:20 UTC  

"He's already a multibillionaire, what are they going to bribe him with?"

2018-12-09 14:13:37 UTC  

Pretty much

2018-12-09 14:13:42 UTC  

King Trump when

2018-12-09 14:14:41 UTC  

all of their properties are rented out (under the george III agreement).. and all the rent income goes straight to the treasury(government)

2018-12-09 14:15:23 UTC  

so people pay about 210m less in taxes... thx to the royal family...

2018-12-09 14:15:28 UTC  

The British Monarchy is a Bunch of Land Agents in current year 😩

2018-12-09 14:15:33 UTC  

see, now that i could support 😛

2018-12-09 14:16:03 UTC  

if they abdicated... the people would need to pay an extra 210m in taxes

2018-12-09 14:16:06 UTC  

ofc i'd rather see no monarchy, unless you have one by rite of conquest

2018-12-09 14:16:16 UTC  

and the royal family would get their properties back

2018-12-09 14:16:40 UTC  

so everyone has to pay that extra 4 pounds 😛

2018-12-09 14:16:42 UTC  

@Dr.Wol what happens after the Monarch who conquered said land Dies?

2018-12-09 14:16:51 UTC  

unless we become a communist state.... in which case their properties can just be taken from them

2018-12-09 14:17:19 UTC  

probably not, if the family abdicated or the UK became a republic I dont see the govt doing anything other than taking most of their properties, well.... those properties deemed part of the institution of govt. and public land anyway

2018-12-09 14:17:30 UTC  

his children inherit the wealth, and its up to the people to decide whether they wanna keep them as royal, or force them to abdicate

2018-12-09 14:17:52 UTC  

anyway, more concerned about our upper house , than the monarchy

2018-12-09 14:18:03 UTC  

get rid of May!!

2018-12-09 14:18:07 UTC  

and the evil union

2018-12-09 14:18:12 UTC  

and corbyn.

2018-12-09 14:18:16 UTC  

abdicate the Parliament

2018-12-09 14:18:44 UTC  

they wont just take properties... not as long as we are a capitalist country

2018-12-09 14:19:01 UTC  

its in the universal human rights declaration

2018-12-09 14:19:27 UTC  

that doesn't apply to wypipo anymore though