This was often brought up as a positive when Donald Trump ran for president.

Aristocrats used to be less wealthy than the Merchants even then they had more power in practice

"He's already a multibillionaire, what are they going to bribe him with?"

Pretty much

King Trump when

all of their properties are rented out (under the george III agreement).. and all the rent income goes straight to the treasury(government)

so people pay about 210m less in taxes... thx to the royal family...

The British Monarchy is a Bunch of Land Agents in current year 😩

see, now that i could support 😛

if they abdicated... the people would need to pay an extra 210m in taxes

ofc i'd rather see no monarchy, unless you have one by rite of conquest

and the royal family would get their properties back

so everyone has to pay that extra 4 pounds 😛

@Dr.Wol what happens after the Monarch who conquered said land Dies?

unless we become a communist state.... in which case their properties can just be taken from them

probably not, if the family abdicated or the UK became a republic I dont see the govt doing anything other than taking most of their properties, well.... those properties deemed part of the institution of govt. and public land anyway

his children inherit the wealth, and its up to the people to decide whether they wanna keep them as royal, or force them to abdicate

anyway, more concerned about our upper house , than the monarchy

get rid of May!!

and the evil union

and corbyn.

abdicate the Parliament

they wont just take properties... not as long as we are a capitalist country

its in the universal human rights declaration

that doesn't apply to wypipo anymore though

everyone has the right to own property, and that the state cannot arbitrarily deprive someone of said property

that's probably why they're bringing non white blood into the family

y'all also have the right to speech, but that didn't apply to Dankula

Rights*

Article 17.

(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

^

test

why is my last message in red?

tbh declaration of universal human rights seems like a stupid idea to begin with

@wacka sometimes discord does that

if you can see other people's message you're good

red text means it wasn't sent afaik

Article 17.

(1) Everyone has the right to own property alone as well as in association with others.
(2) No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property.

universal rights being blocked by discord! 😛

"No one shall be arbitrarily deprived of his property."

And yet the scum raise taxes on us

Only a people who are capable of securing their rights, have their rights secured...