Message from @Tari
Discord ID: 552767922439847946
We should focus on convincing women that feminism is wrong.
And try to enlighten them to men's issues
@James kirk Really? That seems such a mild thing to say, and it seems like they should be onboard with it idology-wise.
I think fathers are necessary
I think they are pretty much obligatory if you want to bring up a child right. Same sex couples can probably do without, but in all other circumstances you really need both a man and a woman.
Yeah. You really do need 2 parents.
i dont think you NEED two parentsm but two good parents is ibviously preferable
Yep. You don't need 2 parents. You're still human that way. But when we take into account the disproportionate likelyhood of getting into crimes when you come from a 1-parent household...
People with a single parent can of course grow up to be perfectly well adjusted people. However the benefits of two over one are clear when we consider the liklihood of that person growing up to be a functioning member of society
Question: why do feminist accounts write rape as r*pe, even in the fucking trigger warnings
Maybe because they consider it a bad word like fuck? I wouldn't know, feminism's sense of logic escapes me
Something something ptsd
I think that logic escapes them too, lol. But I think that's a part of the Tone Police problem they have. They set themselves up in an environment where the slightest slip can and is used against them - so they are hyper aware of what they say and how they say it. It's not a fun way to live, and it doesn't even help rape victims.
It's a good thing, because it means that the trigger-warriors will tear themselves apart.
it is not enough to just be 'progressive', now you need to 'out woke' the 'woke' to be accepted - and it is pushing more sensible thinking people towards conservatism imo.
Aight, i got angry and did a study. About 27% of people are able to have periods, taking into account sex and age, but not medical problems.
thats pretty interesting
its both lower than I thought but also surprisingly high? I don't know where that dichotemy comes from
probably my brain just being weird
You did a study yourself?
Orly? Would you be willing to post that on the MR reddit, or something?
Hey so
At school about that project, teacher changed subject a bit **but** I can still talk about the group itself. So I can't talk about the movement but I can talk about a men's rights group that's accomplished something to put in the presentation.
still good
I can also talk about a specific person instead of a group
but why did she make you change?
more of a planning thing
still a great opportunity. and good on you to do that publicly. taking risks like that is what we need; people like you are what the MRM needs
Now the thing is, I need directions.
I need either an organisation,group or person which has accomplishments and advocates men's rights on a vocal enough level to fit an entire presentation
i suppose a random redditor or discord mod doesnt count
i think she did that as a setup, forcing you to find a specific group/individual so specific criticisms can be found to discredit the,
them
seems like theres no good reason not to allow you to do the movement as a whole
It's possible... But eh, unless accomplishment is defined you can take it to mean a lot of things. As long as *you* consider something an accomplishment, even if it's a seemingly small thing to others, it would still be an appropriate subject
If they try to make it so the accomplishment must be of a certain scale or scope, that's when I'd begin to worry
earl silverman might be someone to consider
@S8N You are in luck! We just had a nice win. A men's rights group got a court to rule that it is unconstitutional to force men but not women to be drafted - and for added humour, feminists tried to claim it's their victory!
Meanwhile, a bunch suddenly started asking "do we really need the draft in this day and age" *sweatting*