I wish you guys could watch this video...

What video? Was it taken Down

It was American Krogan's video on the Brotherhood from Fallout 4

I'll send you a dm

that was a Good Video 👍 @Seven Of Swords

Yeah. I have a few disagreements, but overall I liked it.

I never bought the "The Brotherhood are fascists" argument

if you don't talk to them , probably

I've always sided with the

Brotherhood, so... that's my bias lmao

Oxhorn did a play through of the Brotherhood and still didn't like them, or at least liked the Railroad more. But he's a cuck, so whatever.

"Muh Synths r people"

@Happy Humble Hermit that troll calling was hilarious! I hope I'm lucky enough to watch the next one live

I will be waiting for the thay wwere lTFM wil... Javé.... The

what?

I'm watching the Sam Harris and Jordan Peterson discussion and its fucking stupid.

Religiously naive tradcon vs Predictable Naive Libtard

Its not challenging at all lmao

Peterson speaks out of both sides of his mouth expecting us to believe one over the other, like a true hypocrite.

All the while Sam Harris makes the same arguments that every good atheist has heard since he was 12

really? I think it’s pretty good, I’ve been watching them today too.

Well... I've studied philosophy and psychology in a university so maybe that's why lol

I've studied philosophy of religion and pretty much knew everything that was going to fly out of Harris' mouth

I think that discussion is well above most people’s intelligence level

Perhaps...

Peterson's defenses of his faith position were pitiful

all the while when Harris opened his mouth i had to try very hard to keep myself awake lol

I understand where Jordan is coming from, its hard to pinpoint exactly where he is wrong. I think Peterson is wrong just because my beliefs align more with Sam’s but I haven’t finished part 2 yet

I love listening to Sam though he’s hilarious.

His analogies hit hard

One thing that I've learned from studying is that if it is hard to pinpoint where an argument is wrong, then the argument is not well understood, even by the person making it.

Peterson is no exception to this.

I agree. This is a difficult topic though. Been having arguments about its for thousands of years.

It’s a much more productive debate/conversation than most I’ve seen though.

So, that begs the question. If any argument can be made to be so strong that it becomes increasingly more difficult, if not impossible to point to a false premise, why believe in any argument?

And on the flip side, if one argument can be looked at as having all true premises and a true conclusion, yet any premise can be objected as being false, how can any argument be truly said to be sound?

Validity: an argument is valid if and only if the premises do not yield a false conclusion.

Soundness: an argument is sound if and only if all of the premises being true necessitate the conclusoin being true.