So you can talk about the news what was linked in here

mmk

But not off topic stuff

Why the pingolettos?

Can we take this discussion to <#412721382003179530>

Let's stay on topic gents.

/s

What is happenign?

@Uksio Someone photoshopped a tweet to say the shooter was a Sargonite

What an awful heresy

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/av/world-us-canada-46003892/us-mail-bombs-suspect-cesar-sayoc-was-anti-everything

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WYo87rHMpEk

I appreciate the "why you can trust bbc news" link under the video

you can trust the bbc to find a way to fake the news

Gab lost it's registrar, again

https://twitter.com/getongab/status/1056362626077220865

I think it's time for decentralized social media, like the internet 1.0 inventor was suggesting

it time to call a spade a spade and just say that the platforms like joyent is not a service provider but a publisher and hold them accountable like a publisher and see if they like it what way as they are clearly showing us that they are willing to moderate all the sites that they are hosting.

How convenient that they pull this crap now.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfMe0dsxk_Q

wisecrack is redpilled

apparently

https://www.facebook.com/TheAltCentrist/photos/a.178376276038566/371288540080671/?type=3&theater This is complete bullshit. Gab isn’t responsible for the shooting. In fact, what PayPal is doing shouldn’t be legal or be allowed in any way at all.

"But Bobby, these companies are private, they can do whatever they want."

Fuck their privacy by this point. They're treading on people's natural right to free speech in the name of tolerance, protecting people's feelings, and fighting fake news and extremism. The 1st amendment NEEDS to extended to not just guarantee protection of speech not just from the government, but also from giant corporations from Silicon Valley like Google, Twitter, Facebook, and even Paypal, preventing them from ever discriminating against or deplatforming people based on political ideologies and especially for petty bullshit like "hate speech." It's not irrational to secure people's liberties online from big tech companies, much like protecting workers rights from the factories during the Progressive Era during the late 19th to early 20th centuries.

Someone tell them to use this instead https://njal.la

"someone"

So when are the feds going to tell them to stop this shit with banning people

Don't hold your breath

I’m not

I would be dead

Hey cool I ranked up

The Trump admin is looking into options currently, but idk what they've come up with

I was surprised at how neutral wisecracked came across

Must be listening to Scott Adams

1 Terms of Service legally are sound. And gab signed it by using the service.
2 i dont see how gab touts being free speech when gab itself bans Supreme Court Ruled free speech. You cants have one and do the other. Unless its talk in cheek, "Only free speech i like"

As well those "rights" if inforced by the us would only apply in the us.

And the us gave up a lot of its control of the internet itself under obama.

Nevertheless the right really needs to come up with their own tech Goliath, which is a high order. Patiently waiting to see what comes out of crypto decentralized solutions

A right wing one would be just as bad as the left wing.

Just banning the things they dont like

Sure. But that won't be possible with a decentralized platform

Anyway, it's still very much wishful thinking

Banning everything and forcing people to talk to each other in person

Wish for that asteroid to hit then. And hope that it's not too big