Message from @legio
Discord ID: 552596849165467716
What if alex jones was in the same room with jack dorsey instead of Vijaya Gadde
as if he had no idea what they were supposed to be talking about
and that he has no strong opinions on **his** chosen topic
sargon should have argued with transwomen in sports, would have been a better angle imo
he got starstruck
<:ohsargon:451135765368274954>
I couldn't listen to it
You can expand the definition without actually taking a stance on the sports issue
you dont spit in the face of a giant
its entirely separate
@legio Oh mostly because I dont see the point.
I think the issue of man and woman is a total non-issue
call yourself whatever I dont give a shit
i think not if its about when is a women a real women
Oh then we dont disagree that one guy
I was thinking about this
while I was driving, after trying to listen to the destiny video actually
@legio I do think its odd/weird to say you're a woman for example, whilst not trying to transition. Thing is, I just cant give a shit. So I dont see it as a real issue, you get me?
if trans women want to be women, then okay fair enough but if that's the case then "women" needs be changed to be some overarching term that encompasses both "biological women" and "trans women"
as a result, "women" as a group should be afforded all basic human rights
but "biological women" should have different treatment to "trans women"
traps are gay
segregation in areas where natural women would be vulnerable
Women = everyone who identifies as feminine Man = everyone who identifies as masculine
literally no issue at all
thats the dumbest stance on earth
why
it is the product of delusion
@legio If you're talking about expanding the term "biological man" or "biological woman" I do actually have an issue.
just because you want it to be true does not make it so
@MountainMan Nope only the gender terms.
what is the point of expanding
then natural women and trans women are both "women" by the new definition, but they get treated differently according to the nature of their biology
@legio Well then. I dont agree, nor do I disagree with you.
i am never calling a faggot in a dress a woman, period
how do you know its genuine? and what if not, bigot?
Notorious what does that mean?
@M4Gunner I'm trying to come up with some kind of workable compromise, I'm not saying I agree with this proposal
its some biological women + some biological men but what brings them together is that they all identify as feminine