Message from @legio
Discord ID: 552597436476948490
No what you just said is absolutely not true Notorious
but "biological women" should have different treatment to "trans women"
traps are gay
segregation in areas where natural women would be vulnerable
Women = everyone who identifies as feminine Man = everyone who identifies as masculine
literally no issue at all
thats the dumbest stance on earth
why
it is the product of delusion
@legio If you're talking about expanding the term "biological man" or "biological woman" I do actually have an issue.
just because you want it to be true does not make it so
@MountainMan Nope only the gender terms.
what is the point of expanding
then natural women and trans women are both "women" by the new definition, but they get treated differently according to the nature of their biology
@legio Well then. I dont agree, nor do I disagree with you.
i am never calling a faggot in a dress a woman, period
how do you know its genuine? and what if not, bigot?
Notorious what does that mean?
@M4Gunner I'm trying to come up with some kind of workable compromise, I'm not saying I agree with this proposal
its some biological women + some biological men but what brings them together is that they all identify as feminine
i think the best compromise is ignoring the guy in the dress
lol
Hi
he can do whatever he wants, he's not shitting in the ladies room tho
hi alien @Den Röda Smurfen
👽
Baba
@Den Röda Smurfen hello
So when someone walks into the mens room and looks exactly like a woman you'd have an issue with that?
@MountainMan hejhej
Suddenly on the Titanic everyone identifies as women and wanted into the life boats, trans women succeeded, brave display of the female spirit
because thats exactly what doing it by biology would cause
idgaf what they *look* like
appearance is not *being*
are you slow
do you have a frail grasp on reality
Then what the fuck is your problem?
"exactly like a woman"