why

@legio I'll talk to you

hi

hi dude

Can you bring up any negative consequences for expanding the definitions for man or woman?

he says he wants to talk to Sargon and then as soon as Sargon tries to broach the pre-arranged subject destiny gets cagey as fuck

What if alex jones was in the same room with jack dorsey instead of Vijaya Gadde

as if he had no idea what they were supposed to be talking about

and that he has no strong opinions on **his** chosen topic

sargon should have argued with transwomen in sports, would have been a better angle imo

he got starstruck

<:ohsargon:451135765368274954>

I couldn't listen to it

You can expand the definition without actually taking a stance on the sports issue

you dont spit in the face of a giant

its entirely separate

@legio Oh mostly because I dont see the point.

I think the issue of man and woman is a total non-issue

call yourself whatever I dont give a shit

i think not if its about when is a women a real women

Oh then we dont disagree that one guy

I was thinking about this

while I was driving, after trying to listen to the destiny video actually

@legio I do think its odd/weird to say you're a woman for example, whilst not trying to transition. Thing is, I just cant give a shit. So I dont see it as a real issue, you get me?

if trans women want to be women, then okay fair enough but if that's the case then "women" needs be changed to be some overarching term that encompasses both "biological women" and "trans women"

as a result, "women" as a group should be afforded all basic human rights

No what you just said is absolutely not true Notorious

but "biological women" should have different treatment to "trans women"

traps are gay

segregation in areas where natural women would be vulnerable

Women = everyone who identifies as feminine Man = everyone who identifies as masculine

literally no issue at all

thats the dumbest stance on earth

why

it is the product of delusion

@legio If you're talking about expanding the term "biological man" or "biological woman" I do actually have an issue.

just because you want it to be true does not make it so

@MountainMan Nope only the gender terms.

what is the point of expanding

then natural women and trans women are both "women" by the new definition, but they get treated differently according to the nature of their biology

@legio Well then. I dont agree, nor do I disagree with you.