Message from @Weaboo Kempeitai
Discord ID: 639245486494056458
It's still addictive
physically
scumfucks
REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEE
I don't think a lot of people understand that
Again, assuming that all drugs users immediately become addicts, and all addiction is harmful. Many rich people do coke, but don't immediately spiral downwards. Many drugs, if done correct, aren't even addictive. Like adderall and morphine, simply controlling your dossage can prevent your brain from developing a tolerance.
you are essentially proposing that after drug legalization, drugs would change such that people would be able to be fully functional while addicted to them @Weaboo Kempeitai which is a completely ridiculous thing to say
it doesn't matter, people won't do that
@Deleted User We were talking about taxes. Not about the legitimization of force that is being used to extort these taxes.
people won't not become addicted
these aren't arguments
>don't immediately spiral downwards
I'm not going to continue with you until you realize how stupid what you're saying is
If we're talking about drugs, what about the Portugal's model?
its just a complete rejection of reality
You don't understand. Prohibition correlates with potency. Many legal drugs, including alcohol, have become less potent.
Yes, I do think drugs can be improved to better serve society. We can make mood altering drugs that don't have as damaging side effects. We should.
Let people OD on shit.
Survival of the fittest
let nature work
Yes
BASTE
@Weaboo Kempeitai decriminalization
@Tuze Yes, but not good enough.
Nerthulas saliva gets me high
Salvia is the craziest drug ive ever had
I wouldn't call it a high
@Deleted User Not an argument. My statement is that the act of taxation without consent is theft.
It lasts 5 min
Yes, I do.
People moralfag with cocaine and heroin to people who want to legalise benefitial drugs like PCP.
@Weaboo Kempeitai what you need to do if you want to continue on the topic is this: for every nitpick or question that you have about why legalization of a drug will cause more people to be addicted to it, you need to iteratively think about what my response (the obvious response) will be - do this until you understand that legalizing drugs will increase the number of people who are addicted to them in a given society, then we can continue the conversation
Like, I don't care. Addicts are a drop in the water, deaths caused by illegal drugs are a drop in the water.
"the money you get exists merely from the government" - The most stupid thing I have every heard.
Money in its purest form is a representation of force of labour. Define "nation" and "state" for me?
I vote for more mone
<:yay:638817157840502815>
Damn dude, this is depressing
@Nerthulas They won't. Legalisation decreases potency, as is evident with alcohol, which increases addictiveness. You will decrease potency, as efficient with alcohol post-prohibition, which will decrease addictiveness.
But considering that addicts have the propensity to commit violent crime, why wouldn't property owners under the natural order, discriminate against addicts? Effectively using social coercion to completely discourage consuming addictive substances?
nugger