Interesting that there's so many positive answers when the top two degrees are business and psych :^)

I bet it works out about like you expect.

or maybe the LGBTQ movement has become more authoritarian and something to be feared

say the wrong pronoun and be attacked

Bow down to the faggotry

I mean, I think the non-binary and "million genders" bullshit also is part of that

@grant In your picture, did they combine 39% and 22% and just called it 40%? Or was factored in already.

no 14+25=39 which is "nearly 40%"

Yeah, read the question underneath the pie chart

RE: LGTBQ picture
It could also have to do with the mainstreaming and acceptance of pedophilia

We need to make a map of free states vs fallen states in the US

Get the ball you idiot!

That map might just be the electoral map at this point

Well if the Texan governor is going more Neo-con I don't know about that, and then you have states like PA that have flipped

This is why Vice is dying

@grant
Even members of the *"LGBTQ+"* community are turning on the movement.
That's how bad its gotten.

@RuRu is that graph real?

i'm trying to figure out if this person is making a joke, or unironically doing one of things the person said is toxic femininity.

no, TDMRAs is for real

but, I think they think the tweet is a lie

They're trying to mock the person they replied to, in not a very smart way

It falls flat because their world view is that police systematically discriminate against women as agents of the patriarchy when in reality all of society is heavily biased towards upholding the safety and well being of women

For good reason by the way. Women are far more valuable in terms of reproduction which is one of the largest influencers of our evolution

https://twitter.com/RussiaInsider/status/1143520244356399104?s=19

Oh boi. The mood of our country is now determined by the subhumans in internet comment sections according to literally who even

*DESTROYED*

*BRUTALIZED*

*WRECKED*

SHAPIROD

Does the 2nd amendment cover this?

Possibly, but if you used the nuke outside of self defense... I would fire my nuke at you.

next target

Too late

Matt describes why nukes aren’t covered by the second amendment pretty well in one of his videos. Basically the second amendment protects the individual’s right to keep and bear arms including all weapons that could reasonably be deployed in defense of one’s self, family, or property without necessarily harming non-attackers. So this includes all guns including automatics but doesn’t include things like hand grenades and rocket launchers for example since the potential for collateral damage is inherent