Message from @DJ_Anuz

Discord ID: 585195272267759619


2019-06-03 17:57:53 UTC  

I get what your saying, but the math seems to be that an attempt and an actual dead body are separate.

2019-06-03 17:58:16 UTC  

pretty much what micamike is saying

2019-06-03 17:58:33 UTC  

I think we should just get rid of the prison system and permenantly exile anyone that commits the big three. Theft, murder, or rape.

2019-06-03 18:00:30 UTC  

1. Premise: Recidivism is a real and incurable phenomenon
2. Premise: Thieves, murderers, and rapists are a threat to civilized society
3. Conclusion: NEW TV SERIES DEBUTING ON FOX THIS FALL!!! DEVIL’S ISLAND!!!! REAL CRIMINALS, REAL DRAMA, REAL FUN!!!!

2019-06-03 18:02:33 UTC  

Seriously. I see nothing wrong with this.

2019-06-03 18:02:56 UTC  

Bring back the Colosseum.

2019-06-03 18:07:11 UTC  

I just wish there was a way to remove all doubt surrounding the veracity of a conviction. If we knew with 100% certainty that an individual committed cold blooded murder it would be great if we could save all the time and money with a 115 grain, 12 cent solution

2019-06-03 18:07:36 UTC  

But as long as we can’t be 100% sure we can’t do that

2019-06-03 18:10:23 UTC  

We should at least have the option available for the instances where it's 100% certain.

2019-06-03 18:13:49 UTC  

Of course. Like these high profile mass murders should essentially be “what say you? Guilty. *bang*. Next.”

2019-06-03 18:18:27 UTC  

That’s far too efficient for government.

2019-06-03 18:28:12 UTC  

Problem there is that too many cases would suddenly become "100% certain"

2019-06-03 18:36:14 UTC  

Set an objective standard. There needs to be proper video evidence.

2019-06-03 18:53:11 UTC  

Exile only works if you control your borders

2019-06-03 18:53:50 UTC  

Lots of deported criminals just return.

2019-06-03 18:55:13 UTC  

Ten years hard labor for anyone caught crossing the border illegally. Add ten years for every additional offense.

2019-06-03 18:55:16 UTC  

Not if they’re exiled to an island broadcast every Tuesday and Friday on Fox this fall

2019-06-03 19:35:14 UTC  

@Deleted User so basically bring back indentured servitude?

2019-06-03 19:35:41 UTC  

No, when your sentence is over you go back home.

2019-06-03 19:57:05 UTC  

At least they blatantly market this piece of shit as a opinion piece.

2019-06-03 20:03:35 UTC  

I mean that's 90% of the guardian shit that gets linked all over

2019-06-03 20:04:06 UTC  

most of these media institutions are just opinion pieces without good citations for the factual claims made therein and jumping the gun on "breaking news"

2019-06-03 20:05:58 UTC  

I laughed when they made it seem like post birth abortions were a boogyman.

2019-06-03 20:06:26 UTC  

i'm not opening a "the Guardian" link

2019-06-03 20:06:29 UTC  

If anything this wave of abortion bills are in directly caused by Virginia.

2019-06-03 20:06:39 UTC  

i refuse to give them my clicks

2019-06-03 20:07:48 UTC  

This came before Virginia

2019-06-03 20:07:56 UTC  

crap

2019-06-03 20:17:13 UTC  

That actually makes me very sad.

2019-06-03 20:17:28 UTC  

Sentencing should be based on intent not outcome

2019-06-03 20:18:11 UTC  

Intent cannot be proven.

2019-06-03 20:18:19 UTC  

Outcome many times can.

2019-06-03 20:19:24 UTC  

And the percentage of accuracy, wether its 100% or 95% really depends on what you think humans are worth. Personally i would put human worth at a lot less than the cost of lifetime imprisonment

2019-06-03 20:20:41 UTC  

If you cant prove intent but can prove negligence, then the punishment should be lesser

2019-06-03 20:30:09 UTC  

The abortion article is a joke, "look the exagerate the number of late term abortions" then "their real goal is to hold women accountable for miscarriages" i.e. they are bad for outlining outliers now look at my outlier

2019-06-03 20:31:58 UTC  

The people that cite rape, incest and health of the mother as the reasons abortion should be legal are bitching about exaggerating numbers? Fucking LOL

2019-06-03 20:44:05 UTC  

that's pretty silly, considering that the bills explicitly target doctors, not expecting mothers

2019-06-03 21:10:10 UTC  

from that guardian article: *There are the old lies, like the ones suggesting that the women having abortions are careless hussies (51% of abortions are to women who were using contraception; 59% are to women who are already mothers; 75% are to poor and low-income women). Lately, there’s a huge new lie making the rounds, that women and doctors are conspiring to kill babies at birth and calling it abortion.*
Those stats don't disprove the accusation. 49% weren't using birth control (also how many were using it correctly and at the time of conception), being a mother doesn't mean you weren't sleeping around, being poor also doesn't mean you weren't sleeping around.
Also, the second part isn't a lie if the governor of virginia (a doctor) was literally making the case for it on a radio show.