Message from @FrostyCrits
Discord ID: 644331413142765570
ok legalize
Down syndrome has entered the chat.
I Like frostys q
@Mongo Jongo damn you're not wrong
Is he talking. Should I rejoin the VC
ah
now I understand why he said what he said
If you trying to be bored join
OK
changes nothing, but I can at least understand his perspective
@TheCompanyMan Try relaunching discord
That question is a whole can of worms way beyond the scope of the debate
ok will do
What was the question?
is it alright to ask how much experience does Pius have in arguments regarding Godship
Legendary
evidencial moralism doesn't exist
so fondboy's seeking on the subject is actually logically impossible to argue
First thing, never push God onto others...you can let them know but that’s it.
you can't argue an objective evidence to morality without a divinity
which you can't argue towards in the first place
@myth For Pius, do you think that logic as an a priori has been definitively enough established?
Even if you had a divinity to argue from, you wouldn't be arguing for objective morality....
https://i.imgur.com/yiZeVQN.png o shit Gosar sending secret codes
It would just be subjective to the deity
There are objective morals though.
by divinity I'm not referring to a subject of the mind, by divinity I mean something that is beyond realms of reality and controls that reality
objective morals in 2019 good meme
How do you objectively measure those morals?
that's part of what I'm talking about
@lanceleader thats a whole realm of philsophical debate which does not yet have a definitive answer.
without an objective divinity to define an objective morality, you can't have either
I actually think I believe what @Fondboy position is on this. (Waits for the lightning bolt)
lol
what would that be Frasty
that's what I'm arguing about, which is the problem with asking the question about seeking a enpirical moral framework
Murder is an objective moral.
frosty
@lanceleader That doesn't really answer the question