@Paradox So, what i was agreeing with you on.
We do have human biology to consider, but it also entails our ability to choose how we wish to proceed in life (for the most part).Which means we get to choose what's important to us personally and what isn't.
Now it is true that if the majority of humans follow well lad out paths in life that work (unless they start to fail or are being attacked), they can find fulfillment. But it is also true that some people don't/won't/can't choose those paths and find their own fulfillment, whatever that may be.

Its also wonderful someone just accused me of being a pedo for supporting human rights... Oh well, at least i wasn't called a Nazi.

People are so fucking dumb

People are also pretty smart

Yep

BULL FUCKING SHIT

Video or didn't happen

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=31XtXyd99rk
Thoughts?

so Dissenter implemented a "Dissent this" button on youtube now, that's a big deal I tend to forget about dissenter since it's usually a small little icon at the top of my browser this makes it much more noticable

Dissenter demanded my browsing history :/

they just want to know the good porn

Well they can't have it, it's mine :^)

On a serious note, demanding for extra info for basic functionality = immediate suspicion

n

a

@Beemann - oh! I thought my work network had done something funky to my dissenter plugin and thats why it was asking me to update permissions.

apparently they are removing the bit of code that has triggered that check from google. Torba didnt go into detail about what it was for exactly but I think it is something to do with the tabs in the extension itself rather than actual browser history as the warning claimed.

https://www.bbc.com/news/entertainment-arts-47552698

https://www.youtube.com/watch?&v=bH1cQIu9GGw
so google released an extension that does the opposite of Dissenter
https://www.businesstelegraph.co.uk/jigsaws-new-chrome-extension-will-tune-out-toxic-youtube-twitter-facebook-disqus-comments-9to5google/

huh. i wonder how it decides what counts as toxic? probably everything i've ever posted online would end up being filtered out as toxic.

...well, not everything. i do tend to put a lot of "awwwwww'" comments on pictures of pitbull puppies.

then again, they're pitties so anything related to them would be toxic.

no winning on that one i guess.

Anything that's wrongthink, of course

you could actualy try out to see what was considered toxic lol

they had a website before

like a year or two ago

ppl typed in random shit and it told u if it was toxic or not

as usual, if u trashed whites or men or straights, it was not considered toxic lmfao

https://imgflip.com/i/2vy9qq

That's how tune will work.

yeah basically lol

I take no issue if the opposition wants to hide their heads in the sand

They're going to make you hide your head soon too comrade.

Not a viable strategy unless we go full China and then also outdo their efficiency in catching people skipping past it

nah, they'll just ruin chrome by putting it into your browser.

then tell you to make your own browser.

You mean like the multitude of other browsers that already exist?

Plus it's all FOSS. You can just fork it

They'll regulate those out of existence.

and block payment processors.