Message from @Andry
Discord ID: 432184274234638337
> Literally compares shit he doesn't like to Lord of the rings. Then condemns Peterson for psychoanalytic metaphors like "farther" "mother" "son" calling it pseudoscience. But orks and wormtongue are scientific terms.
>About a minute and a half of spiteful ranting about how "race nationalism is the true reality"
> Calls Petersons analysis "cute"
> Persons ideas are "white ideas" but we should act like niggers.
> "Weird pseudo psychological mysticism... Spiritual nonsense" "It's stupid and retarded and dumb" but orks and Saruman are totally scientific tho.
> Literally calls whites he doesn't agree with psychologically damaged. Because alt hype is the REAL PSYCHOLOGIST here.
@Themop didn't realize you left. Tagged you earlier because I was asking if you wanted to move to like laid back or something if you still had religious questions because I'm just tired enough to answer without second guessing myself xD
if not that's cool but I just thought I should get your preference
@elliseliz id be down to talk some more religion stuff.
ooh cool beans
deuces y'all, promise I'm not "ree"ing
Is he trying to court nerds or something? Why would he make a comparison like that?
Maybe he has some analytics we're unaware of and a large portion of his audience are also interested in The Lord of the Rings? lol
Multicultural within the frame of mutually accepted values, sure. When cultures come in that deny those foundational values, that's when it becomes a problem. It doesn't have to be constrained to race.
Could I interject on the question of nations needing an ethnicity?
I wouldn't say modern leftists are communists
Or at least Marxists
Anglin says we'll just taze all the minorities out of America.
Melanin conducts electricity better so it’d probably work
We implemented a democratic process to avoid political violence, if people are advocating political violence to reach their goals, something isn't right there. It's the paradox of tolerance, we aren't tolerant without limit, the limit is advocating political violence for a radical minority opinion.
Democracy is political violence for the majority opinion though.
That's true, but I don't see a viable alternative to enforcing majority opinion. Much different than enacting violence for a minority opinion.
Majority opinion isn’t always desirable for enforcement.
Being a really good wire puller does not a good political governor make
"it should be the goal of any peace loving society to have a population feel safe enough that they see no reason to have weapons, however it should than also be the duty of every citizen within that society to seek to defend the peace the have created"
"maybe maybe maybe"
"actually"
"actually maybe"
on peut aller loin avec des si
@Chépakoi true
"only those who disagree are idiots" is not an argument
but unfortunate
The main issue is consent, a fangirl is very different from an employee
@HURR DURR ROCKY TOP still using google translate?