Message from @lusspanik
Discord ID: 432152973926334464
It's a punchline because the truth hits you right in the gut
Lusspanik jumping in with low iq interventions
nah man I'm kinda happy because I just came up with that response
so now if someone says it's just a joke bro Imma totally say that thing. like sleep deprivation is totally doing me some favors today I think
its a joke from bloodsports. JF said it to andy in a rage
ah
but still though
works as a general concept
like someone asks me a goading troll question, I actually answer it
they say it's a joke
I mean that's a good response
@Themop would you want to move to the other room and talk about the religion thing though? I'm in one of those odd places where I'm just tired enough to give you good answers on it
>spends the first two minutes trying to cover his ass.
>Proceeds to compairs Peterson to Scientology.
>"*Psychological ideas*" lol phycology not real amiright
>Two minute rant about Hitler
>"Lol phycology isn't scientific because we don't have the knock out studies"
>"Big if true" disregarding the problem with postmodernism and neomarxism. alt hype is a socialist so he might want to defend the commies.
>Literally defending the idea of benevolent dictatorship
>But also freedom and market economies are "white" but socialism is also ok. Because... race... Or something.
>"We're running out of time" -a strange out of place comment
>"Marx never said new socialist man"... No that was Stalin. Why is alt hype so defensive about the commies? 🤔
>Peterson fans are white, therefore Peterson is targeting whites
>individualism/freedom/liberty= bad. so Peterson is bad for whites.
> Non whites act like collectives do white should act like non whites. = White niggers
>Explaining to Peterson fans that IQ is a thing. Gtfo
> "Euroopomorphize non whites" = Racial subjectivism
>Dislikes the "Oppression fairy tales" of blacks and Jews. Whites are the truly oppressed people tho
>Literally refuses to understand postmodernism. (Probably because alt is a right wing postmodernist)
>"Africa is poor because Africans kinda suck" lol
> Literally compares shit he doesn't like to Lord of the rings. Then condemns Peterson for psychoanalytic metaphors like "farther" "mother" "son" calling it pseudoscience. But orks and wormtongue are scientific terms.
>About a minute and a half of spiteful ranting about how "race nationalism is the true reality"
> Calls Petersons analysis "cute"
> Persons ideas are "white ideas" but we should act like niggers.
> "Weird pseudo psychological mysticism... Spiritual nonsense" "It's stupid and retarded and dumb" but orks and Saruman are totally scientific tho.
> Literally calls whites he doesn't agree with psychologically damaged. Because alt hype is the REAL PSYCHOLOGIST here.
@Themop didn't realize you left. Tagged you earlier because I was asking if you wanted to move to like laid back or something if you still had religious questions because I'm just tired enough to answer without second guessing myself xD
if not that's cool but I just thought I should get your preference
@elliseliz id be down to talk some more religion stuff.
ooh cool beans
deuces y'all, promise I'm not "ree"ing
Maybe he has some analytics we're unaware of and a large portion of his audience are also interested in The Lord of the Rings? lol
Multicultural within the frame of mutually accepted values, sure. When cultures come in that deny those foundational values, that's when it becomes a problem. It doesn't have to be constrained to race.
Could I interject on the question of nations needing an ethnicity?
I wouldn't say modern leftists are communists
Or at least Marxists
Anglin says we'll just taze all the minorities out of America.
Melanin conducts electricity better so it’d probably work
We implemented a democratic process to avoid political violence, if people are advocating political violence to reach their goals, something isn't right there. It's the paradox of tolerance, we aren't tolerant without limit, the limit is advocating political violence for a radical minority opinion.
Democracy is political violence for the majority opinion though.
That's true, but I don't see a viable alternative to enforcing majority opinion. Much different than enacting violence for a minority opinion.
Majority opinion isn’t always desirable for enforcement.
Being a really good wire puller does not a good political governor make
"it should be the goal of any peace loving society to have a population feel safe enough that they see no reason to have weapons, however it should than also be the duty of every citizen within that society to seek to defend the peace the have created"