Message from @grackul

Discord ID: 515304636995862579


2018-11-14 13:31:31 UTC  
2018-11-19 15:28:24 UTC  

Former Neo-Con -> Libertarian -> Alt-Right here. I started realizing that I didn't believe any of the racialist ideology and I was increasingly defensive of social programs. I've just been reading as much as I could on Marxism/Communism in the last week; I ordered Das Kapital and David Harvey's companion to it last night. I'm wondering, is there a branch of Socialism/Communism that isn't explicitly idpol?

2018-11-22 22:58:45 UTC  

every politics is identity politics

2018-11-22 22:59:41 UTC  

No

2018-11-22 23:05:12 UTC  

yes

2018-11-22 23:05:33 UTC  

my nation vs your nation

2018-11-22 23:06:02 UTC  

isn't identity politics?

2018-11-22 23:06:29 UTC  

Not everyone is nationalistic

2018-11-22 23:06:48 UTC  

Eg. Marxism

2018-11-22 23:07:29 UTC  

Where workers overthrow their masters independently of all nationality

2018-11-22 23:08:02 UTC  

It must constitute itself the nation, then it is somewhat nationalistic, though not the bourgeois sense of the word

2018-11-22 23:08:19 UTC  

yeah

2018-11-22 23:09:39 UTC  

but in marxism rich and ideological capitalists are the enemy

2018-11-22 23:11:01 UTC  

indentity politics is about establishing a group and the enemy of that group

2018-11-22 23:11:13 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/314649062928547840/515303272223997977/image0.jpg

2018-11-22 23:13:11 UTC  

Idpol still breeds sectarianism

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/314649062928547840/515303767051075623/image0.jpg

2018-11-22 23:13:35 UTC  

of course it is

2018-11-22 23:15:21 UTC  

just look how MLs hate trotskyist

2018-11-22 23:15:59 UTC  

without criticizing his ideas

2018-11-22 23:16:39 UTC  

just because they hate trotsky

2018-11-22 23:17:14 UTC  

>pushes idpol
>also pushes non-sectarianism
sounds federal but okay

2018-11-22 23:18:04 UTC  

sectarianism is idpol in nutshell

2018-11-23 09:02:02 UTC  

identity politics is honestly pretty debatable for me

2018-11-23 09:02:25 UTC  

I dont have an opinion on it and I dont know if its in every form of politics

2018-12-01 14:19:03 UTC  

mkay

2018-12-01 18:04:26 UTC  

Orwell was /ourguy/

2018-12-01 18:04:36 UTC  

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/314649062928547840/518487596423184433/Orwell.jpg

2018-12-01 18:07:57 UTC  

Cuckery

2018-12-01 22:31:29 UTC  

so Im researching leninism and I am having trouble with the idea of democratic centralism. It seems like a measure that makes sense in wartime or crisis but not afterwards, and I think after a revolution minority opinions in party debates should be more cared for. The people should not have to completely fall in line and unite behind an action that they dont support just because it won in a slim vote. It sounds like an authoritarian idea that makes sense only in the situation of the russian civil war. Anybody have thoughts on it? I am pretty uneducated so take that in mind
I get "unity in action" but the soviets didnt need to have that after the war, they could have allowed more democratic discourse

2018-12-07 12:45:25 UTC  

wtfrick

2018-12-07 12:45:32 UTC  

Orwell was reformist trash

2018-12-07 12:45:52 UTC  

he'd be a butt buddy of the DSA nowadays @Headshots

2018-12-07 14:17:30 UTC  

Well I see the DSA getting up off their ass and doing more than the anarchists of american or communists of america anytime soon.

2018-12-07 14:18:10 UTC  

It's easy to hold revolutionary ideas, it's another thing fighting for them.

2018-12-07 20:01:00 UTC  

the PC-USA is even worse

2018-12-07 20:01:24 UTC  

american communists are all LARPers, without exception

2018-12-07 20:26:49 UTC  

PC?

2018-12-07 20:26:57 UTC  

Oh