Especially not back then

Who the hell would trust a time traveling air force anyway?

Lel not surprised Aussies who are British criminal penial colony have a criminal for folk hero.

yes america never made heroes out of outlaws

really

i mean

try harder

Ned Kelly was a good dude okay

No he wasnt

And it depends on the outlaws and their actions

But in general obviously criminals arent good people

nor should they be thought of as "heroes" since its just bastardizing the term at this point.

You dont know anything about ned kelly

I live in the same area he lived in

iv been to the places he went

Iv seen the prison he was held in - i drive by it most days

i know what he did

Dont lecture me on ned kelly you have no idea what was going on back then

do you even know what part of australia he was from

without googling

No, nor do I care. And I do know some about him. The fact that he killed innocent people and innocent cops is disgraceful. You should be ashamed for sucking his dick.

>innocent
>cops

>innocent
>cops
>cops who treat literally everybody who isnt a rich squatter like shit

>cops who repeatedly harassed ned kelly's family back before he even started robbing people

>cops who killed his dad and arrested his mom for no reason

>cops who attempted to kill him because he borrowed a friend's horse and when it was discovered his friend had stolen it they sentenced him to a sentence half as long as ned's

>cops who fired on a group of hostages during a shoot-out

>cops who made thousands of unjustified arrests looking for kelly

>"innocent people"
>never shot/killed a civilian

>bandaged a policeman's hand after accidentally shooting him

>policeman proceeded to rat him out after promising that the help and kind treatment he'd been given was apology enough

@Amoviet they didnt treat the majority like shit genius. If that was the case there'd be a civil war. and yes because both of them could've robbed it and also his repeated offences. And no most of these "unjustified arrests probab;y are because they were also criminals who helped Ned. And he clearly did, why take hostages if you're not going to kill any? And he killed innocent cops too. What a good cop, he did his job so none of his brothers would get killed.
@DA GOMMIE JOO and I highly doubt that these were for no reason. And the proof that the cops intentially shot the hostages is?

G day mates

Want some roast dingo on a stick?

“Why take hostages if you aren’t going to kill any”
He never killed any of his hostages, do your research.
“Innocent cops”
Already explained that.
“The proof that cops shot the hostages is?”
Siege of Glenrowan.
“They didn’t treat the majority like shit”
Yeah, they did. Again, do some research.
“Probably because they were criminals”
Those arrests were made because they arrested anyone who they *even slightly considered could be working with him, including protesters.*

Clearly you haven’t ever done research on Kelly in your life.

"Siege of Glenrowan" as in a citation
"He never killed any of his hostages, do your research." then he's an idiot and still killed cops and tried robbing banks and blowing a police station up.
"Yeah, they did. Again, do some research" if they did there'd probably be a civil war. How about being more convincing with a citation?
"Those arrests were made because they arrested anyone who they even slightly considered could be working with him, including proteste" You mean suspects and people who tried helping Ned like criminals.
"Clearly you haven’t ever done research on Kelly in your life." I can say the same for you with your lack of citations.

"there'd probably be a civil war"
there nearly was actually

And it didnt happen because??

Because its all bullshit, you're welcome past me.

Any WA comrades here?