Message from @Marushia Dark
Discord ID: 657439221304524871
Lemme guess: UK
Oh what a surprise
There should be research on which countries are more likely to produce certain types of news
West Yorkshire PC Amjad Ditta, also known as Amjad Hussain, was charged with sex offences against children aged between 13 and 16.
thatd be correctomundo
_West Yorkshire_
shes knows the charges are bs
Title: BREAKING: Rep. Ilhan Omar Named as Adulteress in Lover Tim Mynett’s Divorce Settlement - Source: gateway pundit
wouldnt she be stoned for this in Somalia
<:thinking_clown:590855640268668928>
I'd like to know what each got as sentence, rather than totaling them up. If they each got ~12 years, good. They could've easily killed those they victimized.
diverse hairstyles, to be honest
The middle one actually looks like a homo tbh
Asian teens looking a lot like a bunch of muslims in their 20s
Where does it say they were asian?
I mean. 37 years total or each?
Total.
Hm
Depends on what else they did
I don’t know if I would charge a man with 12 years for tying someone up and just peeing on them
And no that’s not how law works. Yes they put them in a victimized situation and that is punishable no doubt about it. @Goodwood of Dank™
I would give them 8 years each.
With clear means to get out on good behavior
Because keeping them in prison is doing nothing but radicalizing them for not even a very painful crime
Title: IOWA MAN GETS 15 YEARS IN PRISON OVER BURNING LGBTQ FLAG - Source: infowars
> I don’t know if I would charge a man with 12 years for tying someone up and just peeing on them
Well, depends ... if they're "asian", just fucking yeet them from the country.
Trump Isn't Impeached Until the House Tells the Senate
https://www.bloomberg.com/opinion/articles/2019-12-19/trump-impeachment-delay-could-be-serious-problem-for-democrats
@UnScottable We covered that already- repeat offender, BnE laws, theft. The item itself is irrelevant.
https://apple.news/AS9X4tSJLQhGkYL2B2v-3FA
Because it's never good enough
Yea! 'is norf FC, not gay FC
the item is not irrelevant as part of his charges were for hate crimes. So in fact that item was very relevant. At least the court thought so. Also when i linked the article I didnt give any sort of opinion on whether or not I thought the guy should be in trouble or not. So...