who needs 6.8mm

The US military

"markedly better than anything else in inventory, especially considering our strategic resource reserves"

@Pirate Headcrab It’s not a gimik. It gives a shorter overall length with a longer barrel length, making it a hell of a lot more versatile when it comes to range.

@Asdrubal In fairness Sig Sauer also has something in the running.

Just hope they don’t pick the dumpster fire that is the Textron offering.

It’s got a fucking **nub**

I know why bullpulps exist

But its not as practical for field operations, its good for making accurate rifles but not much else

If it was just for a sniper then it would make sense, the most accurate rifle ever is a bullpulp iirc

@Pirate Headcrab Why not? When it comes to field operations you can go from a mountain to a cave or mudhut in seconds. That extra reach with a shorter length can matter.

Yeah tbh

All the other contracts are fucking shit

Trying to get the futuristic aesthetic of the XM8 but failing horribly

time for the US to get its own version of the SA80

<:lmao:591182326013100034>

Yay, time to get the burger civil servant

What does this have over the standard m4 platform? What does it imrove, because it certainly doesn't *look* better

Honestly there isnt much you can improve on the ar platform beyond ergonomics, which bullpulp is absoloutely worse with

The US is more interested in a change of caliber than platform

You can make ar/m4s that use different calibres. The 6.8mm is very comparable to 5.56/.223

@Pirate Headcrab You know, or the AUG.

6.8mm is more similar to .270 win than 5.56

It's still similar

Similar bullet diameter /= similar round

I think I may be too autistic about my proposal for universal health care

@---- got proof of the plans existence before the Nuremberg Trials?

https://youtu.be/AhRBsJYWR8Q

@Asdrubal tl;dw

It's just him saying the idea of human rights is too western and forced

^

@Asdrubal

yes

<:ChadThunderCock:620468668631089173>

cuck philosophy is based

E Michael Jones and his cohorts are proponents of White Genocide

@Bruni I simply do not care wignat, he is fighting for something more important. His position on it is that "white" as identity is a new invention that distracts what we should be fighting for. He also recognizes that it is useful for countering explicitly anti white groups that we face now. He has more nuance than you think.

He is a great man, don't diss him like that

who is jones?
i keep hearing about him but he just seems like run of the mill reactionary alt right

Saying that White identity is a negative identity is White genocide in that a negative identity isn't something to be perserved, it should be abandoned. If an identity is something to be abandoned then the people who have that identity dont deserve a homeland and shouldn't have a homeland which gives people license to impose living conditions that lead to a reduction in birth rates and deracination, both parts of the UN definition of genocide