gamer moment

⊂ヽ
　 ＼＼ Λ＿Λ
　　 ＼( 'ㅅ' )
　　　 >　⌒ヽ
　　　/ 　 へ \
　　 /　　/　＼＼
　　 ﾚ　ノ　　 ヽつ
　　/　/
　 /　/|
　(　(ヽ
　|　|、＼
　| 丿 ＼ ⌒)
　| |　　) /
⊂:

<:thonk:520003926381166597>

Show them this.

Bam, multiculturalism gone.

step 1: nationalism

step 2: profit

Pretty much. I can only speak for America, I don't think their is a political solution for us. This system has to run it's course but we can help speed that up by withdrawing from it and we can build support systems outside of the government and capitalism. It seems their may be a political solution for parts of Europe, but it's mainly the parts that are resisting the EU already.

What, in your opinion, are the best tactics for opposing and confronting multiculturalism and internationalism?

If you support them, explain why.

I think healthy multiculturalism can take root in economically similar nations

You're never going to have an issue where the majority of Europe moves to South Korea for instance

or vice versa

It just breaks down when financial incentives are introduced rather than cultural, political, or personal ones

Of course if you allow free movement between say, South Korea and Japan, not much bad will come of it

if you allow free movement between Russia and the UK, of course the UK will be absolutely flooded and replaced by Russians in no time at all

Of course by requiring nations to be economically similar we're de facto banning all immigration from africa and central/south america to any white country

-

If you take this to an extreme it'd become jewry but 25% of the UK being Swedes, Germans, or French who moved there of their own accord isn't really an issue

culture is a weird word because it means nothing, I never argued for multi-racialism of a nation

I just argued for Germanics to be able to move to fellow Germanic nations if they feel they want to

Kind of like the EU but not allowing shithole countries to move to nice countries

Just because culture is abstract it doesn't mean it's nothing, this is corruption of a high degree. You initially argued about Europe and South Korea, don't play motte and bailey. Small migration between similar genetic and cultural backgrounds is standard and not an issue, this is far from multiculturalism. But allow a different people to land on your ground and soon you'll see that wherever they step, your country becomes theirs.

Yes

Though this is all autistic because even my idea of economically similar nations makes me a nazi in the eyes of the current system

My point is that even if you allowed the Koreans to immigrate with some effort to Europe, they wouldn't take up the chance often enough for it to matter.

This is currently the situation with Anglophones and Asia, and anglophones aren't really moving to asia in swathes

Meanwhile the small Asian migration is already enough for you to need to learn Chinese, Korean and Japanese above any other European language in international business and China every day owns the entire world a bit more.

With extreme tribalism, do I add

"What, in your opinion, are the best tactics for opposing and confronting multiculturalism and internationalism?"

Well, a very sound stratagem would be education white leftists or leftists in general (though anyone who is in support of multiculturalism, this also need apply) on the extreme level of animal abuse taken in the production of Kosher and Halal meats. It has International animal rights activist groups in a tizzy (though, as per the media, its rarely talked about) for obvious reasons. Leftists love multiculturalism, but those sad dog pictures on TV boil their blood more then Starbucks being temporarily out of soy lattes. This is (what I call) a non-compute red-alert scenario for a leftist. You see these now and again, where you say something and a leftist's face goes blank (and its fucking hilarious to watch) as they are put intellectually between an "unstoppable force" and an "immovable object."

That's at least one tactic I can come up with currently, but obviously there are many more.

Also, its tough on the Internationalism stuff, though I would suffice it to say, that its not necessarily the economic factors that most hate about Internationalism. Most people see trading between nations as a net positive. I think the issue arises when Globalists begin to sway Internationalism into a warped "one people, one earth" style of ideology. However, probably the best bet to curbing internationalism is to put in place government policies and immigration reforms, that increase the overall net worth of labor of the people in said country, while making it not economically, socially or politically feasible to outsource.

This would, however, require a complete restructure of the economic style of said country, and may not even be feasible.

Allahu akbar!

Jihad!

*Not_FBI_Agent_xXx_1488HeilHilter_xXx has logged on*

Hi, Not_FBI_Agent_xXx_1488HeilHilter_xXx, i heard you are not an FBI agent!

that is cool