Message from @Joshu
Discord ID: 627658769022713866
Yet she couldn't prove that claim
Well, she did. Its just the Court disagreed.
Understood does not mean objective.
You see thats the difference, she had to prove she was innocent.
In places that actually have sensible legal systems, they would had to prove she was wrong.
just dont object to islam and you're fine, stay in your place peasant
Simple.
They wernt false though were they?
She just didnt provide the evidence...or enough of it
It relies on interpretation. And to class as defamation, a court as to positively prove the crime, which would mean they would have to prove her claims to be false. Which they can't.
Claims she couldn't support.
thing is whether she was an expert or not, whether it was a lecture containing lies or biased explanations or not, she was prosecuted for *defaming a long dead religious figure* - which is a blasphemy judgement no matter how you try to interpret it
a claim that was supported
and therefore isnt defamation
No it wasn't supported
The claim itself is supported
maybe not in that seminar...to the court's disgression
However it isnt an untruth
If he were a paedophile then why continue living with his wife after she turned 18?
If this were true.
whether it was supported or not is irrelevant
having sex with a child is a pedophilia
Because he was married. And marriage is a sacred bond under Allah, regardless of age. The question is **why he married a godsdamn child**
no matter if you keep them around afterwards
many pedos have relationships with elders while fucking kids
Correct, it's "pedophilic disorder, psychosexual disorder, generally affecting adults, characterized by sexual fantasies about or attempts to engage in sexual acts with a prepubescent child of the same or opposite sex."
whether its true or not doesnt even matter
Sorry libs, can't prove he was a paedophile.
We also don't know if she was his only underage concubine.
Only his most notable.
"And marriage is a sacred bond under Allah"
Easily broken
If the man so chooses.
And if he were a paedophile, then he would have chose that.
And gotten himself another 8 year old.
But, he did not.
This is one of the reasons im glad we are leaving.
The justice system, they presume guilt.
Not unless if having loads of wives was useful for other reasons.
why focus on islam tho, im sure catholic priests fucked more kids than mohammed
Like, being essentially slaves.