Message from @Weez
Discord ID: 627659226528874503
a claim that was supported
and therefore isnt defamation
No it wasn't supported
The claim itself is supported
maybe not in that seminar...to the court's disgression
However it isnt an untruth
If he were a paedophile then why continue living with his wife after she turned 18?
If this were true.
Thats a silly argument
whether it was supported or not is irrelevant
having sex with a child is a pedophilia
Because he was married. And marriage is a sacred bond under Allah, regardless of age. The question is **why he married a godsdamn child**
no matter if you keep them around afterwards
many pedos have relationships with elders while fucking kids
Correct, it's "pedophilic disorder, psychosexual disorder, generally affecting adults, characterized by sexual fantasies about or attempts to engage in sexual acts with a prepubescent child of the same or opposite sex."
whether its true or not doesnt even matter
Sorry libs, can't prove he was a paedophile.
We also don't know if she was his only underage concubine.
Only his most notable.
"And marriage is a sacred bond under Allah"
If the man so chooses.
And if he were a paedophile, then he would have chose that.
And gotten himself another 8 year old.
But, he did not.
This is one of the reasons im glad we are leaving.
The justice system, they presume guilt.
Not unless if having loads of wives was useful for other reasons.
why focus on islam tho, im sure catholic priests fucked more kids than mohammed
Like, being essentially slaves.
Once more
a pedo is a pedo if they have sex with 1 child as an adult
and then spend the rest of their life fucking adults
yeah but fucking kids isn't ok by the bible
Polygamy is a major thing. You can have many wives.
So why bother breaking a marriage at all when you can just marry again?
Cross that line once
and congrats
youre a pedo
yup, you cant unpedo
Did they even have children?
Can't revirgin. Can't unpedo.