Interesting...

~~~
Building Gab chat now
~ https://gab.com/a/posts/102842966868863840

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-49808208

https://www.indiatoday.in/world/story/european-powers-back-us-in-blaming-iran-for-saudi-oil-attack-urge-broader-talks-1602599-2019-09-24

```Google had argued that the obligation could be abused by authoritarian governments trying to cover up human rights abuses were it to be applied outside of Europe.```

Unpersoning is only ok when we do it <:hyperthink:462282519883284480>

https://fee.org/articles/envy-is-the-root-of-many-modern-evils/

https://fee.org/articles/the-not-so-new-green-deal/

so the idea is "they did it wrong last time", I think I heard this somewhere else

https://apple.news/AZMYmI7-nQ7iFT2R-YY-cVw

'Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn said the ruling showed Mr Johnson's "contempt for democracy"

looks like Corbyn is going to come through with brexit then

OH WAIT

So, it's unlawful every year

that wouldnt be a contradiction of principle

and we cant have that

we need to judge everything on a case by case basis

where things that benefit me are good

and things that detriment to me are bad

thats how we gun run it

they said its only unlawfull if theres no reasonable grounds to frustrate parliment for so long.

seems like a daft ruling to me

'reasonable'

not subjective at all

that's why i think its daft, they didn't really explain how it was an extreme effect on democracy either

they just said the act of prorouging itself has an extreme effect

but hasn't this been

the longest session of parliament

though to be fair, why would that matter

was it prorogued last year

i remember vaguely that i think it was

but i'm not certain

It happens every year for the queen's speech

i remember it has been

the years before

and it's a regular thing

the problem seems to be more the leangth, and the core of the reasoning is because of brexit parliment needs to be sitting to do its job.

it's weird the fuss arbitrarily being generated for... something so normal

youd think 3 years of negotiating with a parliament full of traitors to the parties would mean something

but i guess not

lets go globalists yeet yeet

they also noted at the start of the docment that parilement suspended its rules so it could enact legislation. but they didn't touch on that and i'd like to know if suspending parlimentary rules to get legislation through that you'd like is ilegal or not