a whut?

exactly. It is extremely naive because he is assuming he will always HAVE the money to battle the bank in court when in such a scenerio, the bank is denying you ACCESS to those resources

If it was "accidentally frozen" then yes, you can sue the bank

du du hed

you need MONEY to sue

you won't HAVE money

the bank will have it

You can apply for legal aid for civil cases

then DON'T have it all in one place!

They're looking into making civil law more accessible

lol; like a frozen account at one bank doesn't alert the other banks

what is this? 1970?

I wish that is real

Lmao, you come across as a taxi driver who has all their money in cash stuffed in a mattress.

Heres a thought

If you're so worried, just dont use banks

Sadly I can see some aliasing artefacts

A taxi driver HAS no money

Lmao, most just dont report the cash payments, or at least under report it

the threshold for a lawsuit is 2.5k

hows those diversity quotas panning out

Your mattress is the best bank <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

Hows the USs?

anything below that limit is a write-off because of the expense of the court

and no taxi driver is gonna have 2.5k + just sitting around, even if it just in his checking on reserve

Hehe discussion on banks

ueuheuueueueuehe

PEP is drunk again

QQ

Lmao

Oof

PEP is just a teller at a bank.

this is also an advatage to keeping the interst rate artifically low

PeP is in finance, so that is quite likely

no incentive to save means people tend to have less liquity on hand and invest the majority of their spare earnings

I feel sad for you, constantly living in paranoia thinking the banks are out to get you

......one day

I bet PEP is nothing but a bank teller.

and investments are notoriously hard to liquidate in a pinch