and it didn't USED to be like that

Freezing your account just allows them to investigate, under UK law you are entitled to compensation for any emotional and financial pain its caused if you are vindicated.

oh really.. lol

very naive

No, its the UK Law

as if you would have the capacity to SUE the bank if all your money was accidently frozen

sue with what?

naivete doesn't enter the question lmao

Problem with UK law is it can be really expensive to access

^^

why is my channel 4 news anchor talking to me in a doo rag

a whut?

exactly. It is extremely naive because he is assuming he will always HAVE the money to battle the bank in court when in such a scenerio, the bank is denying you ACCESS to those resources

If it was "accidentally frozen" then yes, you can sue the bank

du du hed

you need MONEY to sue

you won't HAVE money

the bank will have it

You can apply for legal aid for civil cases

then DON'T have it all in one place!

They're looking into making civil law more accessible

lol; like a frozen account at one bank doesn't alert the other banks

what is this? 1970?

I wish that is real

Lmao, you come across as a taxi driver who has all their money in cash stuffed in a mattress.

Heres a thought

If you're so worried, just dont use banks

Sadly I can see some aliasing artefacts

A taxi driver HAS no money

Lmao, most just dont report the cash payments, or at least under report it

the threshold for a lawsuit is 2.5k

hows those diversity quotas panning out

Your mattress is the best bank <:hypersmugon:544638648721604608>

Hows the USs?

anything below that limit is a write-off because of the expense of the court

and no taxi driver is gonna have 2.5k + just sitting around, even if it just in his checking on reserve

Hehe discussion on banks

ueuheuueueueuehe

PEP is drunk again