Message from @Tonight at 11 - DOOM
Discord ID: 609512260922245137
if you look historical research, there's theories that muhammad didn't even exist
ye, they were popular 40 years ago
@Violetskies, you trust Google?
Mecca wasn't marked on byzantine maps till 3 centuries later
ofc not, re-read dude
Omayyids used crosses on their coins
and then it turned out that more research points to him exsting actually
Oof
what DO you trust @Violetskies
your sources are old research
That's a good question. What do you trust?
What can anyone trust?
General Relativity: Publish 1914
Old doesn't mean invalid
it's just a theory
another one is that he was actually from petra
rather than Mecca.
ye
I know
as I said
I generally throw out anything a Marxist has to say, but listen to and am critical of other ideologies.
made largelly invalid by more recent stuff
like?
I read about this shit years ago
recent = more valid?
lol
oh ffs
not in the social sciences
i never read the english lit. just the arabic one
ofc that recent doesn't necessarily mean more valid you moron
so uh, what's your sources?
Where did the social sciences even come from? What are they rooted in?
I just mean that more archeological info has been collected since then
and it points in other directions
say whwat you MEAN, MEAN what you SAY.... moron
well if you look at the manuscripts
It seems to exist just to perpetuate propaganda
like birmingham manuscript and San'aa manuscript
there's a lot of loopholes within them.
as well