Message from @ManAnimal
Discord ID: 609512130957541377
Googled it, a.l.o.t. of articles and shit that say 'al ghazali is blamed buh he dindu nuffin'
At the beggining they were
well you COULD say that 'science being the new god' as lead the West to it's current degeneracy
iwouldn't
but some would
so it's probably true, knowing google and this constant obsession with apologising for muslims
they weren't @Tonight at 11 - DOOM ,
if you look historical research, there's theories that muhammad didn't even exist
ye, they were popular 40 years ago
@Violetskies, you trust Google?
Mecca wasn't marked on byzantine maps till 3 centuries later
ofc not, re-read dude
Omayyids used crosses on their coins
and then it turned out that more research points to him exsting actually
Oof
what DO you trust @Violetskies
your sources are old research
That's a good question. What do you trust?
What can anyone trust?
General Relativity: Publish 1914
it's just a theory
another one is that he was actually from petra
rather than Mecca.
ye
I know
as I said
this is old reasearch
I generally throw out anything a Marxist has to say, but listen to and am critical of other ideologies.
made largelly invalid by more recent stuff
like?
I read about this shit years ago
recent = more valid?
lol
oh ffs
not in the social sciences
i never read the english lit. just the arabic one
ofc that recent doesn't necessarily mean more valid you moron
so uh, what's your sources?
Where did the social sciences even come from? What are they rooted in?
I just mean that more archeological info has been collected since then