that fucker

weren't bright enough to grasp 'math' without an intermediary

bottom line is that people bought what he preached

If you were a culture of desert nomads you wouldn't be that smart either...

and just let go of science altogether

most muslims weren't desert nomads.

Googled it, a.l.o.t. of articles and shit that say 'al ghazali is blamed buh he dindu nuffin'

At the beggining they were

well you COULD say that 'science being the new god' as lead the West to it's current degeneracy

iwouldn't

but some would

so it's probably true, knowing google and this constant obsession with apologising for muslims

they weren't @Tonight at 11 - DOOM ,

if you look historical research, there's theories that muhammad didn't even exist

ye, they were popular 40 years ago

@Violetskies, you trust Google?

Mecca wasn't marked on byzantine maps till 3 centuries later

ofc not, re-read dude

Omayyids used crosses on their coins

and then it turned out that more research points to him exsting actually

Oof

what DO you trust @Violetskies

your sources are old research

That's a good question. What do you trust?

What can anyone trust?

General Relativity: Publish 1914

Old doesn't mean invalid

it's just a theory

another one is that he was actually from petra

rather than Mecca.

ye

I know

as I said

this is old reasearch

I generally throw out anything a Marxist has to say, but listen to and am critical of other ideologies.

made largelly invalid by more recent stuff

like?

I read about this shit years ago

recent = more valid?

lol

oh ffs